Volvo Community Forum. The Forums of the Volvo Owners Club

Forum Rules Volvo Owners Club About VOC Volvo Gallery Links Volvo History Volvo Press
Go Back   Volvo Owners Club Forum > "Technical Topics" > PV, 120 (Amazon), 1800 General
Register Members Cars Help Calendar Extra Stuff

Notices

PV, 120 (Amazon), 1800 General Forum for the Volvo PV, 120 and 1800 cars

Information
  • VOC Members: There is no login facility using your VOC membership number or the details from page 3 of the club magazine. You need to register in the normal way
  • AOL Customers: Make sure you check the 'Remember me' check box otherwise the AOL system may log you out during the session. This is a known issue with AOL.
  • AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net users. Forum owners such as us are finding that AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net are blocking a lot of email generated from forums. This may mean your registration activation and other emails will not get to you, or they may appear in your spam mailbox

Thread Informations

Is this supposed to be there?

Views : 27291

Replies : 13

Users Viewing This Thread :  

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Nov 8th, 2023, 06:35   #11
25PSi
New Member
 

Last Online: Apr 24th, 2024 20:14
Join Date: Nov 2023
Location: Dublin
Default

Would it be in any reasonable way beneficial to route Hose 1 directly to air intake plenum?

There are no SMOG inspection here for anything older than '86. So i can do basically what i need. And i believe i need to restore this "Oops" to the correct way.

Would this cause rough start in any way?
25PSi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8th, 2023, 13:14   #12
powen1
Member
 

Last Online: Apr 24th, 2024 12:45
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Herts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 25PSi View Post
Would it be in any reasonable way beneficial to route Hose 1 directly to air intake plenum?

There are no SMOG inspection here for anything older than '86. So i can do basically what i need. And i believe i need to restore this "Oops" to the correct way.

Would this cause rough start in any way?
Im sure your get other responding but could you attach a pic of the pipe running from point 5,6 on Ron's diagram and follow that pipe and check that no red plugs are in that pipe ? or is it connected correctly as Ron's diagram
Paul
powen1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8th, 2023, 15:37   #13
142 Guy
Master Member
 
142 Guy's Avatar
 

Last Online: Today 15:46
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Saskatchewan, Canada
Default

The very original design of the Bxx engine just vented to atmosphere through the oil trap box on the side of the engine, not through the oil filler cap. The design change occurred when they implemented positive crankcase ventilation. B18 and B20 engines have used two versions of PCV. In one version air flow is in through the filler cap and out the oil trap and in the other the air flow is in through the the oil trap and out the filler cap. The B20E and F on 25 PSi's car used the in through the oil trap and out the oil filler cap as per Ron's diagram.

Ron's diagram shows the PCV getting filtered fresh air from just upstream of the throttle plate. That arrangement was a P1800 E/ES thing; but, apparently not all P1800 E/ES cars. On the B20E in my 1971 142 E filtered air comes from the bottom of the air filter hosing with a hose that loops over the engine to the oil trap. 25PSi's car looks to have that same arrangement. You can see the hose looping over the valve cover and the boss on the intake manifold where the port for the air inlet would be is undrilled.

Positive crankcase ventilation may help with emissions; but, it predates exhaust emission control in North America (1972). Its primary benefit is providing positive air flow through the crankcase to reduce build up of nasty stuff in the oil and as such is an engine life enhancing feature.

To Ron's question, my recollection is that the calibrated restriction on the B20E / F is machined in to the nipple fitting. To Rustinmotion's question about the additional air flow causing a lean combustion condition, The B20E / F is a manifold air pressure (MAP) controlled fuel injection system. The system monitors MAP and RPM and adjusts fuel accordingly. It does not care whether that air enters via the throttle plate or through any other path. The controller will works its magic to provide a correct fuel mix. What air flow through the PCV will do is alter idle speed. That calibrated restriction in the nipple fitting is critical to limiting PCV air flow so that you do not end up with a 2500 RPM idle speed.

I don't know for sure; but, it is possible that a previous owner used the plug in the PCV hose as a dodge to deal with high idle speed. The thermostatically controlled idle air valve on the B20E / F is a chronic problem area on aging D jet engines. If the idle air valve sticks in the full open or close to full open position you will end up with a high idle speed. Perhaps rather than fix the idle air valve a previous owner decided to reduce air flow into the intake by blocking off the PCV to reduce air flow and idle speed. If 25PSi reconnects the PCV and all of a sudden has an extremely high idle speed which cannot be adjusted down he may have an answer to the mystery plug.
142 Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 21st, 2023, 02:16   #14
25PSi
New Member
 

Last Online: Apr 24th, 2024 20:14
Join Date: Nov 2023
Location: Dublin
Default

So i took out they little plug and seemingly nothing changed. I since had oil arrestor cleaned out, as it was recommended and makes good sense.

I am keeping this exactly as it is now, with only change being fresh PCV hose from the top of the cover to the manifold.
25PSi is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 19:28.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.