Volvo Community Forum. The Forums of the Volvo Owners Club

Forum Rules Volvo Owners Club About VOC Volvo Gallery Links Volvo History Volvo Press
Go Back   Volvo Owners Club Forum > "Technical Topics" > XC90 '02–'15 General
Register Members Cars Help Calendar Extra Stuff

Notices

XC90 '02–'15 General Forum for the P2-platform XC90 model

Information
  • VOC Members: There is no login facility using your VOC membership number or the details from page 3 of the club magazine. You need to register in the normal way
  • AOL Customers: Make sure you check the 'Remember me' check box otherwise the AOL system may log you out during the session. This is a known issue with AOL.
  • AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net users. Forum owners such as us are finding that AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net are blocking a lot of email generated from forums. This may mean your registration activation and other emails will not get to you, or they may appear in your spam mailbox

Thread Informations

XC90 and its dated engine, Volvo need to buckle up

Views : 4959

Replies : 46

Users Viewing This Thread :  

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Mar 19th, 2011, 06:21   #41
RoyMacDonald
VOC Member
 
RoyMacDonald's Avatar
 

Last Online: Feb 1st, 2023 11:27
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Rye, East Sussex
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Volvophile View Post
A couple of years ago they gave it 4.5/5 stars in their original roadtest as well.

It's amazing how the mighty fall.
In their opinion. The XC90 has already obtained iconic status in automotive history in my mind.
__________________
1984 245 SE 1986 345 SE Auto
1991 940 TD Auto 2003 XC90 D5 SE AWD Geartronic2002 V70 D5 SE Auto 2014 V40 D2 SE Tiptronic Cross Country 2017 V40 D2 Cross Country Geartronic Pro 2015 XC60 D5 Polestar SE Lux Nav AWD Geartronic
RoyMacDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 19th, 2011, 07:46   #42
bobdabuilda
Premier Member
 
bobdabuilda's Avatar
 

Last Online: May 31st, 2022 11:32
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: south
Default

Sorry but those journalists are just muppets. To my mind the car has a very distiguished and classy look which withstands the passage of time when all other cars are morphing into pathetic clones of each other.
Yes the engine is a bit rough but that shouldn't be hard to overcome with todays technology. If Volvo could sort that out and improve fuel economy, maybe with a hybrid drive, then this car would still beat any in its price bracket for years to come.
bobdabuilda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 19th, 2011, 09:55   #43
The Painter
Senior Member
 

Last Online: Dec 20th, 2015 16:07
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wisbech
Default

The Autocar test is further confirmation that the once great motoring magazine has long passed its sell by date, poor content and very poor journalism.
The Painter is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to The Painter For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 19th, 2011, 13:15   #44
reggie59
Senior Member
 

Last Online: Mar 26th, 2023 22:29
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: London
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Painter View Post
The Autocar test is further confirmation that the once great motoring magazine has long passed its sell by date, poor content and very poor journalism.
Very poor and written by a lazy journalist who confuses the reader about the 2006 face lift and 2011 improved engine. It is either incompetence or laziness, probably both.

I stopped buying autocar years ago. They are a bunch of spoilt kids. They cannot even bother to measure true economy. At least autoexpress seems to live in the real world.

But I do not bother either with them...

Log on www.honestjohn.co.uk

great guy, great advice.
reggie59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 19th, 2011, 13:22   #45
Clan
Experienced Member
 
Clan's Avatar
 

Last Online: Today 11:23
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: L/H side
Default

[QUOTE=reggie59;866675]Very poor and written by a lazy journalist who confuses the reader about the 2006 face lift and 2011 improved engine. It is either incompetence or laziness, probably both.

I stopped buying autocar years ago. They are a bunch of spoilt kids. They cannot even bother to measure true economy. At least autoexpress seems to live in the real world.

But I do not bother either with them...

Log on www.honestjohn.co.uk

great guy, great advice.[/
QUOTE]


His advice is more general than specific and he gets it wrong too , advising somone to change their 850 expensive gearbox oil to cure clutch drag ! one of a few mistakes i have noticed .. hes ok on fiat pandas and toyota yaris , honda Jazz etc .. cars which he actualy drives ..
__________________
My comments are only based on my opinions and vast experience .
Clan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 19th, 2011, 16:17   #46
Rentagas
Swedish Chef
 

Last Online: Jan 29th, 2024 18:09
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Tiger Country
Default

Well OK

The XC90 has a fairly rough, unsophisticated thirsty engine.
The XC90 has a suspension that both feels every bump and sways around corners. It is not a "top gear" drivers car yet Jeremy clarkson has one!

I am sure if the engine and suspension had been updated it would be a better car BUT it wouldn't be available with a 10k discount. As it is it's a very luxurious 7 seater which is up against the likes of the discovery and Q7 which given their more modern design should be so much better but they're not. They also look horrible.

Yes instead of buying my 33k exec I could have bought a similar spec disco or q7 this would have had more power and torque, handled better but also cost 50K. The XC90's competitors in terms of cost are the Kia Sorrento and Hyundai Santa Fe and as such it wins hands down.
Rentagas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 19th, 2011, 23:26   #47
wagga
Member
 
wagga's Avatar
 

Last Online: Jan 19th, 2013 23:41
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Perth
Default

The XC90 may not the most dated cars around, but it's moving towards the evergreen status. Still could not find any SUV out there that looks as smart as the XC90, even though body design is 8 years old. It still turning heads. And the occasional stare because many stereotyped Volvo drivers as idiots drivers "because they are driving the most safest car in the world". I don't care.

Engine performance is reasonable. It is built for family safety. Over the years, the changes that was made, I believe many don't even know. I know it went from timing chain to timing belt and later back to timing chain. 2.5T to 2.9T and later came up with the V8 and I6. 5 speed Aisin to GM 4 speed and later the 6-speed Aisin are some of the development.

For my need, 99% on the bitumen road, and for the regular road trips, the 3.2I6 is more than sufficient. (For school run, I just used my wife B-Class or my back up Fiesta). I definitely won't want to do 120mph with whole family in the XC90, or even just myself. That is not being responsible.

Prior to purchasing the XC90 (7 seaters), I tried the Prado, the Pajero, the Trebica, Disco 3 and the Kluger. None had the full tick on my checklist, unlike the XC90. Did not consider the Q7 because looks ugly.

Just my thought.
__________________
2009 XC90 AWD 3.2
wagga is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:44.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.