Chas x posts from RT Mechanics thread

[outnumbered]

Originally Posted by gmain1967

Well everybody was getting "hitched" on there, seems that we aren't immune to it either....

your point is that we should brush it under the carpet i dont think so

[gmain1967]

Originally Posted by outnumbered

your point is that we should brush it under the carpet i dont think so

Would you be so good as to elaborate how/where, i said "that we should brush it under the carpet..."?

Nope? Didn't think so.

"Older but no wiser"? Your words, not mine...

[outnumbered]

Originally Posted by gmain1967

Would you be so good as to elaborate how/where, i said "that we should brush it under the carpet..."?

Nope? Didn't think so.

"Older but no wiser"? Your words, not mine...

nice try does not cut with me, i have a question for you are you condoning what brucie has done, and please spare me the i have not a clue syndrome.
mike

[gmain1967]

Originally Posted by outnumbered

nice try does not cut with me, i have a question for you are you condoning what brucie has done, and please spare me the i have not a clue syndrome.
mike

What do you mean "nice try"? Either show me where I have said that, or retract it and stop posting false statements. I have not condoned it, nor indeed do I intend to condone it. From what I have read (try that, it's quite informative), I understand that any wrong doings are being remedied through the correct channels, as posted by Hitcher himself. And where have I indicated that I don't know what it's about? My "Eastenders" reply was in response to the post by chris, nothing else.

[t5_monkey]

Originally Posted by outnumbered

important no bully i dont think so. looking on here and vpcuk there are people who are trying to pass on valuable information. that said you are i believe still under the official secrets act and as such should not disclose any issues that may bring the RAF into disripute.all that the HITCHER as far as i am concerned was doing was to inform vpcuk BRUCIE.had contravined DPA and was making the members aware of that.
mike

Then why are they using people's full names? you keep passing over that issue.

What RAF issues are you referring to specifically, which posts?

Which paragraph and section of the OSA?

How do you know if I am or am not covered by this, have you been cyber stalking me and my background?

Have you obtained information about me illegally or improperly?

are you attempting to use any information about me in an attempt to harass or intimidate me?

Is that you holding a live weapon in your Avatar? if so... you're not aware of the army guidelines on acceptable internet photographs then?

I'll give you one thing - 'older but no wiser' at least you say what you think, and evidently tell the truth!

Now please go back to behaving in a way worthy of your proud service to this country over your 22

[foggyjames]

I think if anyone is seeking to be "devious" with regard to their identity, then an "outing" is only to be expected...but I'm a little disturbed by just how much of it is going on in this thread, without real purpose.

Having said all of that, didn't Bruce start it (albeit inaccurately!)...?

cheers

James

[t5_monkey]

Originally Posted by foggyjames

I think if anyone is seeking to be "devious" with regard to their identity, then an "outing" is only to be expected...but I'm a little disturbed by just how much of it is going on in this thread, without real purpose.

Having said all of that, didn't Bruce start it (albeit inaccurately!)...?

cheers

James

If we didn't enjoy them just a little we wouldn't read or reply though would we ?

[-chris-]

Originally Posted by The Hitcher

Im not sure what Eastenders is but i am informed that it is a soap opera dealing with fictitous incidents and situations.
To confuse and to parady what BruceT has done is very disrepectful to those who he has offended.

To mock as you have the importance of the context of the situation is IMO, very poor.

However this is a free to comment forum so im sure your comments will be taken on board.

Any parody is not in relation to Bruce, but the long drawn out drama that this has turned into... By the sound of it he's been a fool and is going to pay the price. If that is what you are crusading for the i think you can stop now..

I can't be any more diplomatic...

[strbryan]

Originally Posted by t5_monkey

Then why are they using people's full names? you keep passing over that issue.

What RAF issues are you referring to specifically, which posts?

Which paragraph and section of the OSA?

How do you know if I am or am not covered by this, have you been cyber stalking me and my background?

Have you obtained information about me illegally or improperly?

are you attempting to use any information about me in an attempt to harass or intimidate me?

Is that you holding a live weapon in your Avatar? if so... you're not aware of the army guidelines on acceptable internet photographs then?

I'll give you one thing - 'older but no wiser' at least you say what you think, and evidently tell the truth!

Now please go back to behaving in a way worthy of your proud service to this country over your 22

RAF Intelligence my ass. Can you not tell the difference between between an American uniform/ assault rifle as compared to a British uniform/assault rifle??Dumb ass chimp.

It would also seem you not aware of the "army guidelines on acceptable internet photographs".To take the **** out of a member of HM force who served his country for 22 years seems a bit low in my opinion and seeing how you only managed 2 years before leaving...Sorry why was it you only managed 2 years???

[outnumbered]

Originally Posted by foggyjames

I think if anyone is seeking to be "devious" with regard to their identity, then an "outing" is only to be expected...but I'm a little disturbed by just how much of it is going on in this thread, without real purpose.

Having said all of that, didn't Bruce start it (albeit inaccurately!)...?

cheers

James

you are quite correct and i for one are guilty of that not intentionally off course.i would like to thank the moderation team for not closing the thread off. at times it must have been a difficult call and appoligise for my posts if they seem a bit off handed. i do not contribute to a thread unless i feel comfortable with what i have written that also goes for the maintance sections so on that note i will no longer post any more comments on this thread bar 1.
may i call you SPROG T5 MONKEY,
for those that are not famillar with the word SPROG its a word used for young recruits/ officers that have just joined and are still wet behind the ears
i was not referring to any of your posts about the RAF just pointing out that as you where a member you are subject to OSA.as brucie is to his employer.
there is no paragraph in OSA you sign it when you join/ discharged, FACT. in answer to your other points i will list them in order i have answered 3 of your statements.
4 NO
5 NO.
6 ref the avitar in the old days we would not have been behind a wall up and at em.
7 yes i do say what i think but we are all different are we not.
8 yes i will go back to behaving in a way thats appropriate, and will continue to enjoy my retirement, pulling the shed and relaxing, but one thing assured i can hold my head up high with the knowledge that i did achieve something and contributed in the safety of Britain/ UK.
and on a final note may be we need to follow in there footsteps.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gawJBOI83kM.
mike