Volvo Community Forum. The Forums of the Volvo Owners Club

Forum Rules Volvo Owners Club About VOC Volvo Gallery Links Volvo History Volvo Press
Go Back   Volvo Owners Club Forum > "Technical Topics" > 200 Series General

Notices

200 Series General Forum for the Volvo 240 and 260 cars

Information
  • VOC Members: There is no login facility using your VOC membership number or the details from page 3 of the club magazine. You need to register in the normal way
  • AOL Customers: Make sure you check the 'Remember me' check box otherwise the AOL system may log you out during the session. This is a known issue with AOL.
  • AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net users. Forum owners such as us are finding that AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net are blocking a lot of email generated from forums. This may mean your registration activation and other emails will not get to you, or they may appear in your spam mailbox

Thread Informations

B230K engine conversion to B230FT

Views : 4587

Replies : 32

Users Viewing This Thread :  

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Jan 26th, 2008, 22:10   #21
Glen Morangie
Economy motorist
 
Glen Morangie's Avatar
 

Last Online: Aug 13th, 2022 07:48
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: London
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EYB View Post
What is the best combination should I decide to install the dual carb system?
Surely it will depend on what manifold you can get - other than that for 'fit and forget' reliability Solex or SU, for performance Weber, but I doubt you will have much choice.
Glen Morangie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 26th, 2008, 22:57   #22
Suterman
240 Turbo
 

Last Online: Apr 15th, 2024 22:14
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: shropshire
Default

If you really want to use carbs and a b230ft I would suggest it would be possible, but I really dont know enough about these things to say.

The trouble is you wont be able to just fit the pistons that you have ordered as you need to check the cylinder bore sizes and the piston size and stuff like that.


Mike Brace is talking a lot of sense.

"Whilst it is possible to build up an engine and management system out of various bits and pieces it is fair easier and will cause far less problems to be able to transfer a complete good running engine and gearbos complete with its management system and wiring. For a start you know that everything is working before you start the project and know any problems have to centre around mistakes made on the wiring side of things."



If you find a nice b230ft you could remove the inlet manifold and put your penta inlets and carbs on, you would need to make a plenum chamber thingy to go over the carbs, you may also have to adapt the carbs to the inlets using a plate.


like this guy...


http://forum.savarturbo.se/viewtopic...ressor&start=0


Theres 4 pages there with some pics, I think it is a budget build due to the fact that he had a b23ft motor and some carbs lying around or something like that.

Theres some crazy builds on that site.
__________________
1991 240 Turbo GL
1992 940 GL
1996 940 GLE Turbo Auto
1985 Bedford CF2 B230E
Suterman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 28th, 2008, 05:33   #23
EYB
Junior Member
 

Last Online: Sep 4th, 2008 02:45
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Quezon City
Question

Hi Glen

I got hold of an original dual intake manifold from a 240 marine volvo engine with a dual Solex carbs (requires reconditioning). Regarding the CR of my existing engine (B230FT head on stock, original B230K pistons/block), assuming the FT pistons/rods have the same specs of the K pistons, is it wise to change the pistons/con rods? What would be the final CR if I do the switch? I understand that the CR of the FT engines are lower than the normally aspirated engines such as mine. Am I better off with the existing set-up and just add the dual carbs? I want to use the best combination of higher CR with the dual carbs.
EYB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 28th, 2008, 05:42   #24
EYB
Junior Member
 

Last Online: Sep 4th, 2008 02:45
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Quezon City
Default

Hi Suterman

Thanks for the invaluable inputs. I do admire your set-up!. Like what have previously mentioned, in as much as I want to transfer an existing FT engine set-up to my existing engine, this is my handicap. My vehicle is here in the Philippines with very little source of used Volvo parts and I only gain access for good used parts from the US, but definitely not the whole engine.

My options are basically limited to 2 choices at the moment, with my present set-up, add on the dual carbs-Solex or shift into Webers, or replace the K pistons with the FT pistons (assuming they fit) and add on the dual carbs. I want to know which among the 2 can give me a higher compression ratio.
EYB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 28th, 2008, 06:13   #25
EYB
Junior Member
 

Last Online: Sep 4th, 2008 02:45
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Quezon City
Default

Hi Suterman

I just reviewed the site you emailed and was surprised that IT IS a B230K engine. Which leads me again to the issue of Compression Ratio. B230Ks have a CR of 10.5:1, one of the highest. Turbo models I know have much lower CRs. Can you approximate the computed CR of my existing set-up? B230k pistons on a B230FT head? Will my CR drastically go down if I use the B230FT pistons?
EYB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 28th, 2008, 15:26   #26
Glen Morangie
Economy motorist
 
Glen Morangie's Avatar
 

Last Online: Aug 13th, 2022 07:48
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: London
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EYB View Post
Hi Glen
Regarding the CR of my existing engine (B230FT head on stock, original B230K pistons/block), assuming the FT pistons/rods have the same specs of the K pistons, is it wise to change the pistons/con rods? What would be the final CR if I do the switch? I understand that the CR of the FT engines are lower than the normally aspirated engines such as mine. Am I better off with the existing set-up and just add the dual carbs? I want to use the best combination of higher CR with the dual carbs.
I'm not sure if you are missing the point, or I am - but if you put an FT head (which has combustion chambers) on a B230K block (which also has combustion chambers in the pistons), you will have two combustion chambers combined in each cylinder and a compression ratio of around 5:1.

Is this what you were asking?
Glen Morangie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 28th, 2008, 19:41   #27
Suterman
240 Turbo
 

Last Online: Apr 15th, 2024 22:14
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: shropshire
Default

you can run boost on a higher compression engine, just not as much as on a lower compression (ft) engine. The b230k has high compression, maybe 10.5:1 (dont quote me on that)

you could proberbly run 3 or 4 psi of boost with the right tuning on a b230k

To be honest I can't say for sure.
__________________
1991 240 Turbo GL
1992 940 GL
1996 940 GLE Turbo Auto
1985 Bedford CF2 B230E
Suterman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 29th, 2008, 00:09   #28
Glen Morangie
Economy motorist
 
Glen Morangie's Avatar
 

Last Online: Aug 13th, 2022 07:48
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: London
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EYB View Post
Hi Glen
Regarding the CR of my existing engine (B230FT head on stock, original B230K pistons/block), assuming the FT pistons/rods have the same specs of the K pistons, is it wise to change the pistons/con rods?
I think I may really have missed the point here - are you saying that your current engine (which presumably you were driving around) is a B230K with a cylinder head from a B230FT?

If it is you might get as much performance as you need just by swapping the pistons/ con rods.
Glen Morangie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 29th, 2008, 01:39   #29
EYB
Junior Member
 

Last Online: Sep 4th, 2008 02:45
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Quezon City
Default

Precisely Glen! I bought a junked 240 without the original cylinder head. I was able to find one that fits (from a B230FT) and it is running, but with poor acceleration and engine response, unfortunately the donor FT engine was sold as scrap.

This leads me to my concern of Compression Ratio. With the original 10.5:1 of the B230K. As you mentioned, having 2 combustion chambers (FT and K combined), CR will drastically drop. Now if the FT pistons and conrods do fit the B230K block and finally having just 1 combustion chamber, approximately what will be my final CR?
EYB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 29th, 2008, 08:59   #30
Glen Morangie
Economy motorist
 
Glen Morangie's Avatar
 

Last Online: Aug 13th, 2022 07:48
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: London
Default

I’m afraid I’m a bit confused, as some of your posts seem to have conflicting information (or maybe I’m misunderstanding them).

It seems you first asked if it was possible to convert a B230K Solex CISAC setup to a B230FT, but you later added your B230K in fact has a cylinder head from a B230FT already fitted – retaining the B230K pistons and CISAC carb (and it lacks power).

You have also purchased a Volvo Penta manifold, and may decide to use it with either Weber or Solex carbs.

You then discovered the B230FT engine you planned to swap in was in fact a B21FT, and the associated transmission is manual, whereas yours is automatic.

Later on you said the B230K flat top pistons were installed…….

I think you need to note a few points:

1. The B21 engine uses a different bore to the B23 or B230, so the pistons won’t fit your existing engine.

2. The B230K has a flat cylinder head, the cylinder head has no combustion chambers, instead they are machined into the pistons.

3. B230K pistons are not flat (but you will have seen this when the head was fitted).

4. If you have fitted a cylinder head from a B230FT to your B230K without changing the pistons, because you will have two combined combustion chambers in each cylinder, the compression ratio must be very low, and the engine won’t have much power.

5. The main things which affect the compression ratio are the sizes of the cylinder bores and the compression chambers.

6. If the setup is as described in 4 above, and you now swap the pistons to some suitable for the B230FT (which I think may actually be slightly dished) you should get a compression ratio of 9.8:1.

7. I would think the cost of purchasing a B21FT and shipping it from the USA to then be installed with all it’s associated parts will be far more than buying new pistons for your existing engine.

8. My advice would be as in 6 above, then decide if you want to change the carb.

9. If I were trying to ship an engine from overseas and it wasn't certain exactly which type of engine was being shipped, I'd be looking elsewhere.

10. From the data I've got available (which may not be definitive) I looks like the con rods would be the same, and it's just the pistons/rings you'd need, however the B230K does tend to develop piston slap so you may find uneven bore wear, so best to check that before you order any new parts.

Hope this helps.

Last edited by Glen Morangie; Jan 29th, 2008 at 09:28.
Glen Morangie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:05.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.