Volvo Community Forum. The Forums of the Volvo Owners Club

Forum Rules Volvo Owners Club About VOC Volvo Gallery Links Volvo History Volvo Press
Go Back   Volvo Owners Club Forum > "Technical Topics" > Performance Volvo Cars
Register Members Cars Help Calendar Extra Stuff

Notices

Performance Volvo Cars A forum for those interested in any Volvo performance car from any era, FWD, RWD and AWD!

Information
  • VOC Members: There is no login facility using your VOC membership number or the details from page 3 of the club magazine. You need to register in the normal way
  • AOL Customers: Make sure you check the 'Remember me' check box otherwise the AOL system may log you out during the session. This is a known issue with AOL.
  • AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net users. Forum owners such as us are finding that AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net are blocking a lot of email generated from forums. This may mean your registration activation and other emails will not get to you, or they may appear in your spam mailbox

Thread Informations

S W Autos & The Mouthy Blonde

Views : 9027

Replies : 85

Users Viewing This Thread :  

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Feb 19th, 2006, 18:01   #21
pault5
Member
 
pault5's Avatar
 

Last Online: Dec 30th, 2017 11:35
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: south
Wink

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aeroresh
Im not trying to stir things up as there is obviously alot more to this story than Im aware of, but I just want to know why go to the bother of changing turbos etc before doing a basic remap which would have netted similar if not more gain?

I thought a standard 240 BHP R should make around 210 WHP on the dyno?


ooooooh should you of not said that!!
pault5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 19th, 2006, 18:43   #22
pyaap
Non-T4 T4s RULE!!!!
 
pyaap's Avatar
 

Last Online: Mar 29th, 2017 11:24
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Bristol / Bath
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aeroresh
I thought a standard 240 BHP R should make around 210 WHP on the dyno?
I don't think that's an accurate estimation / calculation. Based on those figures, surely your car should be making 300 at the wheels, not an estimated 280, as part of your RICA 340bhp upgrade.
__________________


"An Engine Which Runs Lean Lives on Borrowed Time"


http://www.volvoforums.org.uk/showthread.php?t=13998

Last edited by pyaap; Feb 19th, 2006 at 18:47.
pyaap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 19th, 2006, 18:45   #23
swautos
Member
 
swautos's Avatar
 

Last Online: Aug 23rd, 2008 16:36
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: biddenden
Smile

Hi Kids

I think you will find that at the time the price Julie paid for her new turbo and tweeks was less than a Rica remap.

Stuart

Ps 288bhp and a new turbo to boot cant be bad.
__________________
The UKs Fastest Volvo Tuner!
www.swautos.co.uk
www.volvo-tech.co.uk
swautos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 19th, 2006, 18:48   #24
SaffronC70
aka Whitey
 
SaffronC70's Avatar
 

Last Online: Sep 8th, 2008 00:34
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Walton-on-Thames, Surrey
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aeroresh
Im not trying to stir things up as there is obviously alot more to this story than Im aware of, but I just want to know why go to the bother of changing turbos etc before doing a basic remap which would have netted similar if not more gain?

I thought a standard 240 BHP R should make around 210 WHP on the dyno?
I think my 19T and RICA made 265bhp at the crank at PE.

Aeroesh, would be interesting to see what figures you can bag on the PE dyno - just for comparison

Chris
__________________
3" SW Autos turbo back exhaust - Custom intake - S60R Green Injectors - TD04-19T turbo - MTE ECU remap - BSR Boost Gauge - Powerflex / QBM bushes - 19" Volvo Pegasus alloy wheels - Porsche 993 Turbo Big Red calipers - Volvo S60R front discs - AP Racing Pads - 2004 headlamps and indicators - Koni Yellow Suspension Kit
SaffronC70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 19th, 2006, 19:20   #25
pyaap
Non-T4 T4s RULE!!!!
 
pyaap's Avatar
 

Last Online: Mar 29th, 2017 11:24
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Bristol / Bath
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SaffronC70
I think my 19T and RICA made 265bhp at the crank at PE.
Hi Chris,

I thought you had 266 wheel horsepower, not 265 at the flywheel!!

Which 'wheel' are we talking about here??
__________________


"An Engine Which Runs Lean Lives on Borrowed Time"


http://www.volvoforums.org.uk/showthread.php?t=13998
pyaap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 19th, 2006, 19:35   #26
SaffronC70
aka Whitey
 
SaffronC70's Avatar
 

Last Online: Sep 8th, 2008 00:34
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Walton-on-Thames, Surrey
Default

lol - was an interesting day !!

I think it got 266 WHP at VT, but 265 BHP at PE.

I did go back to have diagnostics done at VT at cost, but things turned out ok.

There are some graphs on my website of printouts if anyone is interested.

Chris
__________________
3" SW Autos turbo back exhaust - Custom intake - S60R Green Injectors - TD04-19T turbo - MTE ECU remap - BSR Boost Gauge - Powerflex / QBM bushes - 19" Volvo Pegasus alloy wheels - Porsche 993 Turbo Big Red calipers - Volvo S60R front discs - AP Racing Pads - 2004 headlamps and indicators - Koni Yellow Suspension Kit
SaffronC70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 19th, 2006, 19:36   #27
Aeroresh
Member
 
Aeroresh's Avatar
 

Last Online: Oct 28th, 2021 14:10
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Great Britain
Default

Hang on guys and gals, what's my car got to do with what I asked? and I hope no-one's implying that certain dynos are laced!

Stuart, thanks for that. I think you're the only one who's actually answered my initial question rather than just flaming me for having a car with RICA mentioned!

If you're saying that a new turbo and other stuff is cheaper than a remap then thats a good deal and I guess more of us should consider going down that route. However, I just thought turbos were relatively big bucks compared.

Can we all chill now!
Aeroresh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 19th, 2006, 19:39   #28
SaffronC70
aka Whitey
 
SaffronC70's Avatar
 

Last Online: Sep 8th, 2008 00:34
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Walton-on-Thames, Surrey
Default

Aero we are chilled, well I am, lol.

Just having a discussion as there is nothing else to do in this cold drizzly night - bring on summer.

Chris
__________________
3" SW Autos turbo back exhaust - Custom intake - S60R Green Injectors - TD04-19T turbo - MTE ECU remap - BSR Boost Gauge - Powerflex / QBM bushes - 19" Volvo Pegasus alloy wheels - Porsche 993 Turbo Big Red calipers - Volvo S60R front discs - AP Racing Pads - 2004 headlamps and indicators - Koni Yellow Suspension Kit
SaffronC70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 19th, 2006, 19:48   #29
pyaap
Non-T4 T4s RULE!!!!
 
pyaap's Avatar
 

Last Online: Mar 29th, 2017 11:24
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Bristol / Bath
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aeroresh
Can we all chill now!
Absolutely!

Sorry Aeroresh, I think you may have misunderstood me. My point is simply this:
On the basis of the figures that you are quoting, the transmission losses amount to 12.5%. If that is indeed correct, wouldn't you then agree, that given your car has an M56 gearbox of similar design, you should be expecting to get close to 300whp for a 340bhp map?
__________________


"An Engine Which Runs Lean Lives on Borrowed Time"


http://www.volvoforums.org.uk/showthread.php?t=13998

Last edited by pyaap; Feb 19th, 2006 at 21:14.
pyaap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 19th, 2006, 21:24   #30
bobcat
Premier Member
 
bobcat's Avatar
 

Last Online: Apr 18th, 2024 11:37
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location:
Default

also aeroresh, your taking the figures youve been given for your rica a true.

this has been discussed many times and the rica figures have proved (in my mind and others) to be false.

the rica and even tme will only give about 260-270 bhp on a proper dyno.

are we saying the dyno's are laced, well i am!! - read saffronc70's post and look at his dyno results, then read the other posts from pyaap about how pe produced results with 1-2 bhp from other dyno's he went to.

when i had a chat to marco, he said around 10-12% is correct for the tranny loss.

IC's car made 280bhp on p.e's dyno with a 16t, tme and 3" dp and cat back. so julies figure of 288bhp is actually pretty good.

for anyone that dosent believe what im saying, here is another rica'ed volvo not making claimed power:

http://swededemon.com/850html/The850.html

and to make people think even more about rica's claims, this is his s70 which is running a kkk from the s60r - that gets 317bhp. and if you have a read on his forum, that was using rica's dyno as he only lives down the road from their hq. But i think he is later aiming for about 400bhp from that block.

http://swededemon.com/s70html/s70.html

check out what bhp he gets from his 19t and other goodies!!! - so anyone that says a chipped alone t5 can make 304bhp when he makes 311 with all that needs help!!

people really need to get their heads out of the clouds and accept what our t5's are really capable of.

aeroresh,have you dyno'ed your 340bhp s60 yet?

Just to add, im not stirring or targetting anyone. Its goo that we can have these discussions and try and get to the truth.


Last edited by bobcat; Feb 19th, 2006 at 22:45.
bobcat is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
850 Bumper & plastic trim colour fade & care ChrisWT5 850 / S70 & V70 '96-'99 / C70 '97-'05 General 13 Jan 12th, 2012 00:45
SW AUTOS COME UP TRUMPS ......AGAIN!!!!!!! RIJKO Performance Volvo Cars 21 Jun 13th, 2005 13:14
Can you tow 340 autos? volvodave 300/66 Series General 2 Feb 27th, 2004 12:35
Apologies "Clan 760" Dave M 700/900 Series General 3 Feb 12th, 2003 14:44
BIG thank you to SW AUTOS Ice Man Performance Volvo Cars 0 Jan 20th, 2003 10:26


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:16.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.