Volvo Community Forum. The Forums of the Volvo Owners Club

Forum Rules Volvo Owners Club About VOC Volvo Gallery Links Volvo History Volvo Press
Go Back   Volvo Owners Club Forum > "Technical Topics" > S80 '98-'06 / S60 '00-'09 / V70 & XC70 '00-'07 General
Register Members Cars Help Calendar Extra Stuff

Notices

S80 '98-'06 / S60 '00-'09 / V70 & XC70 '00-'07 General Forum for the P2-platform S60 / V70 / XC70 / S80 models

Information
  • VOC Members: There is no login facility using your VOC membership number or the details from page 3 of the club magazine. You need to register in the normal way
  • AOL Customers: Make sure you check the 'Remember me' check box otherwise the AOL system may log you out during the session. This is a known issue with AOL.
  • AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net users. Forum owners such as us are finding that AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net are blocking a lot of email generated from forums. This may mean your registration activation and other emails will not get to you, or they may appear in your spam mailbox

Thread Informations

Ulez extension in LONDON - S60 Petrol- Not Compliant.

Views : 2359

Replies : 37

Users Viewing This Thread :  

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Aug 2nd, 2021, 18:49   #1
Gen_Billy
Member
 

Last Online: Mar 20th, 2024 18:39
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London
Default Ulez extension in LONDON - S60 Petrol- Not Compliant.

Hello Volvo Friends,

I have a 2002 Volvo s60.( Petrol) ULEZ is extending, and I am sort of forced to get rid of my 19 year old joy.

It is currently saying its not compliant with ULEZ checker. - I was hoping it be a early adaptor.

I have sent an email to volvo to find out if it is. I have feeling it should be compliant as there are similar aged models that pass the UZEZ checker yet mines don't pass.

See attachments.

My S60 is 240g/km and the V70 is 231g/km - One is complaint and the other isn't.

Any advise.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg V70 2002.JPG (83.7 KB, 24 views)
File Type: jpg S60 2002.JPG (85.2 KB, 18 views)
Gen_Billy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 2nd, 2021, 18:55   #2
MrJames
Member
 

Last Online: Mar 18th, 2024 19:03
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Bognor Regis
Default

What I find even stranger is shouldn't they both be in L?

I've never really understood how they tested these vehicles, my C70 with it's T5 engine on it's MOT test actually burnt cleaner than a lot of modern vehicles, it always baffled me and the tester how it's classed as such a high emission vehicle.
__________________
1999 Volvo C70 T5 - Gone but not forgotten!
2003 Volvo S60 Diesel Geartronic - Feels slow...
MrJames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 2nd, 2021, 18:59   #3
MrJames
Member
 

Last Online: Mar 18th, 2024 19:03
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Bognor Regis
Default

I wonder if the difference is one was registered as Euro3 and the other was registered as Euro4?
__________________
1999 Volvo C70 T5 - Gone but not forgotten!
2003 Volvo S60 Diesel Geartronic - Feels slow...
MrJames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 2nd, 2021, 19:11   #4
stuart bowes
trying to be helpful
 

Last Online: Today 21:06
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Dagenham
Default

Petrol engines need to be of the Euro 4 standard:
https://tfl.gov.uk/modes/driving/ult...s?intcmp=52215

whatever that actually means though I'm none the wiser, how an older car can be euro 4 and the newer one isn't is slightly confusing

am I reading right that the older compliant one is NA and the newer non-compliant one is Turbo.. to be fair, it does have a higher g/kg reading doesn't it (albeit not much)

mines a 2001 2.4 non turbo and that passes, not that I'd use it anyway because the missus has a much newer, smaller, less polluting car with a puny engine and I'm 5mins walk from a tube station. Also i don't live / work within the zone
__________________
V70 '01 auto petrol 2.4 (140) 70k

-------------------------
mini project - link

Last edited by stuart bowes; Aug 2nd, 2021 at 19:17.
stuart bowes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 2nd, 2021, 19:14   #5
old onions
Member
 

Last Online: Sep 2nd, 2023 16:06
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Greenwich, London
Default

My 2006 V70 is Euro 4 , and therefore ULEZ compliant , however my wife's Golf (Euro 3 diesel) and my other car (Euro 3 petrol) are not.

Neither are particularly high polluting vehicles, and if I look at the actual emissions on my car from its MoT tests, it actually meets the Euro 4 standards. However, the car is not homologated to that standard by the manufacturer and therefore it is an automatic fail.

I tried to do some investigation about getting an "exemption" and found that a motorcycle garage in Stratford (E London) was taking certain older bikes , re-tuning them to comply, and then registering this on the TfL computer. When asked about whether this was feasible for cars, he said "never again" the work he had to do with officials , and layers of bureaucracy , had almost driven him mad with despair at times, especially the access to the TfL computor.

Luckily I don't use my other car too often so I am resigned to paying the £12.50 each time I do , rather than taking a much bigger hit on a trade to a newer compliant model.
__________________
Andy G

2006 V70 SE 2.4 Manual
old onions is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 2nd, 2021, 19:29   #6
MrJames
Member
 

Last Online: Mar 18th, 2024 19:03
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Bognor Regis
Default

Part of me wonders if these cars were actually tested or if was based on an estimate as at the time it didn't really matter as there weren't the restrictions there are now.
__________________
1999 Volvo C70 T5 - Gone but not forgotten!
2003 Volvo S60 Diesel Geartronic - Feels slow...
MrJames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 3rd, 2021, 09:03   #7
VroomVroomClonk
Member
 

Last Online: Mar 21st, 2024 13:44
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Suffolk
Default

The TFL ULEZ checker doesn't seem to be working correctly at the moment.

I've just entered my car details, a 2005 V70 T5 and it says I have to pay a ULEZ charge. I entered the same details a few months ago and it said my car was Euro 4 compliant and was exempt from any charges. I still have a screenshot of the first time I did it clearly showing the car passed.
__________________
V70, 2.4 T5, 2005, Manual.
VroomVroomClonk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 3rd, 2021, 09:22   #8
MDS40
Senior Member
 

Last Online: Apr 1st, 2024 17:55
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Berkshire
Default

Same here.

S40 2.4 auto 2006 was previously shown as exempt but did a check after reading your post and now says its not. £15 to £ 17.50 a day payable.

No intention of driving in London anymore but strange none the less.
__________________
2006 S40 2.4 SE Auto. Ruby Red. 83K Miles

Some previous cars include: Jaguar x type: Mazda 6 : Mazda 626: Ford Sierra 2.0: Toyota Celica ST 1600 : Hillman Avenger: Triumph Spitfire:
Oh and a Volvo 340 GL 1984 company car from new.
MDS40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 3rd, 2021, 09:32   #9
VroomVroomClonk
Member
 

Last Online: Mar 21st, 2024 13:44
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Suffolk
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MDS40 View Post
S40 2.4 auto 2006 was previously shown as exempt but did a check after reading your post and now says its not. £15 to £ 17.50 a day payable.
Well that clearly shows that their system is broken. My 2005 car is borderline on the Euro 4 compliance dates, but all cars registered from January 2006 had to be Euro 4, so yours must be exempt from the ULEZ charge.
__________________
V70, 2.4 T5, 2005, Manual.
VroomVroomClonk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 3rd, 2021, 10:26   #10
Kev0607
Premier Member
 

Last Online: Today 19:20
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Manchester
Default

I think its a fair statement to make that these ULEZ zones aren’t solely about emissions, its money.

If people choose to pay £15 a day (or whatever it is) & continue to drive their cars into ULEZ zones, its not really going to lower emissions. Yes, the temptation to drive an older car into a city will reduce because of the charge, but are we really lowering anything?

Yes, people will get buses etc as an alternative to driving, but if anything, a city full of buses would be worse than having thousands of cars? Theirs a difference between a euro 6 car & a bus… the bus obviously won’t be as good to the environment. We have these hybrid buses now… they can only run so long on generated power before the actual engine kicks in.

How many buses & other forms of transport are we going to have to put on the road/tracks so that we aren’t packed in like sardines travelling?
__________________
2007 S80 2.4 D5 - 110,000 miles

Last edited by Kev0607; Aug 3rd, 2021 at 10:31.
Kev0607 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 22:08.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.