|
850 / S70 & V70 '96-'99 / C70 '97-'05 General Forum for the 850 and P80-platform 70-series models |
Information |
|
C70 coupe buying adviceViews : 2300 Replies : 29Users Viewing This Thread : |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
May 14th, 2013, 09:16 | #11 |
Senior Member
Last Online: Nov 4th, 2017 19:04
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: neath
|
PM sent.
|
May 14th, 2013, 13:28 | #12 |
New Member
Last Online: Mar 11th, 2024 20:48
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Bangor
|
I bought a c70 T5 a few months ago. I've had some teething problems (although I expect to sort some issues out when I buy a cheaper car) including the ETM failure. I had this sorted by a local Volvo dealer for £360 fitted, which I thought was actually very good value. I'm hugely impressed by the car. Very comfortable, expecially on long journeys. Looks great. Mine has a full dealer service history and yet the hub bolts were rounded off practically to nothing and I had to cut the old hub free. Mileage wise, I've been getting about 28mpg on a mixture of driving, but I think this improves a lot on long motorway journeys. I would definitely budget to replace the ETM, unless you've documentary evidence that this has already been done. Overall, though, I think these are bound to become a future classic. The T5 is especially fast - supposedly around 240bhp - and when you sink the welly you do get pressed back into your seat. One surprise for me was the insurance cost - I was charged £10 a year more when i moved from a 1.8 Rover 75 to a C70 T5. Happy days!
|
May 14th, 2013, 13:40 | #13 |
New Member
Last Online: Jun 5th, 2013 00:03
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Milton Keynes
|
that's very useful, i'd been wondering about how much i should be worrying about the ETM issue. but at £360 it isn't too bad and worth the risk.
i was originally looking for a 2.4 NA but they are pretty rare (i'm only looking for a manual),so i thought i'd look at the other models for running costs, as long as i stay pre-march2001 the tax is the same for them all, my insurance goes up by £130 from £500 for the 2.4na to £630 for a t5, oddly the 2.4lpt was £610 which is strange given its closer to the 2.4na than the t5 in terms of power. Ideally i'd like the 2.4na or a t5 based on that, while the t5 will be worse on fuel and a bit more to insure i think its worth it given the huge increase in power (70bhp more than the 2.4na). is the t5 a lot better on a run? can someone confirm that? My 1.8T audi wasn't much better on a motorway run than on A roads with the odd junction and roundabout. |
May 14th, 2013, 14:11 | #14 |
VOC Member
Last Online: Feb 9th, 2024 15:31
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: South Lakes
|
I can't really talk for the accuracy of the on board computer in mine, because it's an aftermarket lpg conversion, but from experience it's within a couple of mpg across a full tank.
As with the TDi I had, I find it gets its best economy on a steady 50-55mph run, but doesn't drop hugely right up to 70. The average at 70 doesn't drop much more when holding an average of even higher speeds, if you happen to be in Germany... Mine's a T5 auto, 240 bhp. Fairly extensive service history with it and no mention of any turbo work, it definitely still pulls and I reckon would still make its book figure 0-60 with ease, and that's at 187,000 miles. It depends on the oil grade and frequency of changes, as much as anything! I did notice when parked up in heavy rain on Friday that the passenger door was leaking around the wing mirror, that's the first time I've noticed it! Must look into the cause...
__________________
2008 XC70 SE Lux D5 - 1966 Amazon - 1979 C202 Laplander Past: 1997 S70 TDi, 1997 C70 T5 GT, 2003 V70 Bi-Fuel, 2000 Ph2 V70 2.5D, 1997 V70R Auto FWD, 1998 V70R Manual AWD, 2004 XC90 D5 G/T, 2005 S60 D5 |
May 14th, 2013, 21:05 | #15 |
Premier Member
Last Online: Mar 21st, 2024 21:39
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sevenoaks
|
I bought my C70 T5 just under a month ago and my commute to work is very similar to yours in that it is all A roads doing 50-60mph. I'm getting 26-29mpg but my thermostat needs replacing as it is over cooling so I'm hoping to see that go up a bit once that's done. The one thing I will say though is economy wise I'm not sure it was the most sensible thing to do, my old car did 48mpg! I really wanted the convertible so was limited for engine choice and as the economy of all the petrol engines is very similar I went for the T5, and as others have said insurance was surprisingly low! But if I was going for a hard top I would look at a diesel S70 for the economy benefits. I'm probably going to end up doing a swap with the Mrs so I take the diesel V70 to work and she uses the C70 for the school run and shopping. I know an S70 isn't quite the same if your heart is set on a C70 but I would consider them for the diesel advantage. And to be honest the diesel is a better engine for commuting as it has bags of low down torque whereas you need to rev the T5 for the power.
Having said all of that though, the power of the T5 in the C70 body will put a smile on your face everyday
__________________
1999 V70 TDi (auto) 2002 C70 T5 GT Convertible (manual) 2008 XC90 D5 Executive (auto) |
May 15th, 2013, 11:37 | #16 |
New Member
Last Online: Jun 5th, 2013 00:03
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Milton Keynes
|
yeah i did wonder how bad the economy would be with a T5, i find it really odd that in my experience and from what i hear, turbo'd engines still drink even when they're not pushed along, where a large capacity NA engine can be driven pretty frugally. My brothers BMW 330i easily returned 2 to 3 mpg more than my 1.8T audi. I think i'll have to be honest with myself and narrow the search back to a 2.4 NA engine, it's just going to be used to commute, i've got a stripped out BMW 318i for a toy, and just plodding along the A507 with everyone else a little piece of me would be dying inside if i was returning less than 30 to the gallon.
|
May 17th, 2013, 17:58 | #17 |
New Member
Last Online: Jun 5th, 2013 00:03
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Milton Keynes
|
another question, from reading around this forum and others i'm getting the impression that a generic code reader is no good for 1998/99 C70 models, but fine for reading codes on 2000 and onwards models, is that correct? i've got a generic reader and have found it invaluable with my other/previous cars.
|
May 17th, 2013, 19:24 | #18 |
VOC Member
Last Online: Nov 6th, 2016 10:18
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Blackpool UK
|
Generic code readers will only access the engine parameters and related codes they are useless for SRS, ABS, gearbox aircon etc, for a full ability to read the car you need to be looking at Vida software on a laptop coupled to a DiCE unit that plugs in between the car and the computer, this offers access to everything on the car and doubles as a parts diagram with part numbers making ordering bits so much easier.
Someone mentioned about the ETM failure rate on the 99 to 01 cars earlier in the thread, these can be repaired for just over £100 by a forum member who has a good track record with lots of decent feedback so it's not as costly as it used to be - Mike Edit to add if the car has an ETM then a generic code reader will work with the car for engine only data, without an ETM some will/ might work but no way of knowing until you try it |
May 17th, 2013, 22:23 | #19 |
Premier Member
Last Online: Today 13:38
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Horne (Nr. Horley)
|
Mike - I think generic readers will read most gearbox codes on OBDII compliant cars? Otherwise your post spot on as usual!
I've got a generic (Autel) reader for my OBDII compliant V70 which works well on engine codes, but never had a gearbox fault so can't be 100% certain. Cheers
__________________
Some people are like Slinkies, they serve no useful purpose but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them downstairs. |
May 18th, 2013, 20:31 | #20 |
New Member
Last Online: Jun 5th, 2013 00:03
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Milton Keynes
|
Sorry guys yet another question. Currently in looking for a pre march 01 car on account of the cheaper road tax. Is there any reason why a post march 01 car would be better? Any issues they ironed out or common weak points that were addressed in latter versions?
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|