Volvo Community Forum. The Forums of the Volvo Owners Club

Forum Rules Volvo Owners Club About VOC Volvo Gallery Links Volvo History Volvo Press
Go Back   Volvo Owners Club Forum > "Technical Topics" > PV, 120 (Amazon), 1800 General

Notices

PV, 120 (Amazon), 1800 General Forum for the Volvo PV, 120 and 1800 cars

Information
  • VOC Members: There is no login facility using your VOC membership number or the details from page 3 of the club magazine. You need to register in the normal way
  • AOL Customers: Make sure you check the 'Remember me' check box otherwise the AOL system may log you out during the session. This is a known issue with AOL.
  • AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net users. Forum owners such as us are finding that AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net are blocking a lot of email generated from forums. This may mean your registration activation and other emails will not get to you, or they may appear in your spam mailbox

Thread Informations

1961 Volvo PV544 in Holland

Views : 83223

Replies : 750

Users Viewing This Thread :  

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Feb 18th, 2019, 21:47   #611
Army
marches on his stomach
 

Last Online: Feb 11th, 2022 04:15
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by harpgirl View Post
I'm probably completely off track here but how about an old household bakelite fuse box as an enclosure? Right period, admitedly not automotive but you could incorporate a master cutoff switch where the master would be on the household box.
Shame fuse boxes are rectangular as if they were round I reckon an old Castrol grease tub would have been a good option giving you a screw top but being plastic so the threads don't corrode ust as you need to get in.
On my Defender seat box I installed a circular screw thread locker opening (similar to this, others are available, https://www.ebay.co.uk/i/162569648620?chn=ps) which you could install to any type of right sized container.
Apologies if this is just useless waffle. (Gets me closer to my 30 posts after spending time writing a PM today and finding I can't send it).
I hadn't thought of bakelite enclosures - I'll have a look about - thanks
__________________
1961 Volvo PV544 the quick and easy in between project(!)
1981 Mercedes 300D <=> 230 diesel to petrol conversion project
1965 Series 2a Station Wagon mega build
1992 Mercedes 190E The car that works!
Army is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 18th, 2019, 22:05   #612
Army
marches on his stomach
 

Last Online: Feb 11th, 2022 04:15
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Default Right - a basic electirickery question

Whilst I've been busy connecting the dots (so to speak) between each component I'm wiring and joining things up to a fuse box the thought about how much power I'm going to need has suddenly dawned...

...I mean so far my basic brain has been thinking - oh right that's a 50W bulb so over a length of X meters I need to make sure the wire is thick enough to make sure it won't act like a fuse and ideally thick enough to make sure the voltage drop isn't so great. Essentially - so far it has been easy to say "bugger it I'll use a thick wire and hope they all go through that hole".

Now I'm figuring out the fuses I'll be needing and more importantly how these groups of fuses (and relays) are going to be connected to the charging system (the alternator) and the battery.

If I have an electrical system that needs more power than the battery and the alternator can give I'm going to be in trouble.

I've had to make a spread sheet.



Some of the values in the spreadsheet might not be 100% correct - I've had to guess - for me at the moment it is more understanding what I should be doing (even if I haven't got the right data)

I was thinking about the way in which the electrical components are connected in an automotive system and realised that the electrical loads / components are connected in parallel.

To calculate the maximum possible disaster situation of having everything switched on at the same time - I calculated the resistances of each of the loads and added then together in parallel - then this figure of total resistance got converted to a total current.

I'm not sure this is correct - can someone confirm?

A series calculation of the values in the picture above comes to 160 amps

But I think because it is all in parallel the total current draw would be 100 amps
Attached Images
File Type: png 1961 Volvo pv544 estimated max current draw.png (95.7 KB, 73 views)
__________________
1961 Volvo PV544 the quick and easy in between project(!)
1981 Mercedes 300D <=> 230 diesel to petrol conversion project
1965 Series 2a Station Wagon mega build
1992 Mercedes 190E The car that works!
Army is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 19th, 2019, 16:35   #613
Army
marches on his stomach
 

Last Online: Feb 11th, 2022 04:15
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Default Mini update

I'm still mulling over how I'm going to safely connect the power from the alternator and battery to the rest of the car.

I have decided not to wire everything through the ignition switch - I will be using at least two mini relays and strip fuses with just a token signal wire running from the ignition. I'm still a bit unsure about the amperage calculations and I really need to crack on and get some more accurate data.

Which ever way I look at it I'm fairly sure the existing alternator is a bit on the small side =>



It is rated for 55W - I expect I don't need to have one that can supply everything in the worst case scenario but I need to check what's safest to fit (as in the most reliable)

The ignition switch was easy to find =>



I thought I'd found the headlight switch but it turns out to be the demister fan =>



I wonder where the headlight switch has gone?

####

In other news the reamer for the king pin replacement should be here soon so I've been a painting with Eastwoods rust encapsulator (after poo loads of angle grinder wire brushing as usual - followed by a good soaking in Rustyco rust eater before the rust encapsulator)



Slowly

Slowly
__________________
1961 Volvo PV544 the quick and easy in between project(!)
1981 Mercedes 300D <=> 230 diesel to petrol conversion project
1965 Series 2a Station Wagon mega build
1992 Mercedes 190E The car that works!
Army is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 19th, 2019, 23:28   #614
Austinvolvo
member
 

Last Online: Jan 22nd, 2024 22:45
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: austin, texas
Default

I doubt you really need 100 amps. I have a 40 amp alternator and it seems to be adequate.

dean
Austinvolvo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 20th, 2019, 05:18   #615
Army
marches on his stomach
 

Last Online: Feb 11th, 2022 04:15
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Austinvolvo View Post
I doubt you really need 100 amps. I have a 40 amp alternator and it seems to be adequate.

dean
I agree that for most of the time the amount of current draw would be much less. After hunting about for information it seems like the 55 amp alternator that came with the car is another upgrade (this is the car that keeps giving!) - this size seems to be about the maximum safe size you can fit to an original PV wiring loom.

Because I'm trying to plan ahead and I'm making up my own custom loom I'm thinking about how bad things could get if I decided to add on extras. I've decided to put in beefier wiring - I'm just finishing that off by designing the power route from the alternator. I think for the sake of getting on with the job (this project has taken too long) I'm going to fit a heavy duty wiring arrangement but re-fit the 55 amp alternator and see how it goes.
__________________
1961 Volvo PV544 the quick and easy in between project(!)
1981 Mercedes 300D <=> 230 diesel to petrol conversion project
1965 Series 2a Station Wagon mega build
1992 Mercedes 190E The car that works!
Army is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 20th, 2019, 15:29   #616
Ron Kwas
Premier Member
 
Ron Kwas's Avatar
 

Last Online: Today 20:59
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Connecticut, USA
Default

Army;

Your listing of all loads in the vehicle and totalizing of currents is much what went on, on the electrical engineer's desk during vehicle development...but you did not include one important factor...a column which might have been broken down to show if load use was 1. Continuous, 2. Intermittent, or 3. Occasional...and this column would determine "weight" of the current which would get added into the total...by adding all at 100% without this (including some generous "guesses"), you come up to the high 100A total.

Bottom line is: A 60A rated source will supply all the needs, and have plenty capacity and headroom for additional lighting, or other loads, while still keeping the Battery charged fully (and this has been confirmed by tests and numerous field experiences).

Cheers
Ron Kwas is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 20th, 2019, 16:05   #617
Army
marches on his stomach
 

Last Online: Feb 11th, 2022 04:15
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Kwas View Post
Army;

Your listing of all loads in the vehicle and totalizing of currents is much what went on, on the electrical engineer's desk during vehicle development...but you did not include one important factor...a column which might have been broken down to show if load use was 1. Continuous, 2. Intermittent, or 3. Occasional...and this column would determine "weight" of the current which would get added into the total...by adding all at 100% without this (including some generous "guesses"), you come up to the high 100A total.

Bottom line is: A 60A rated source will supply all the needs, and have plenty capacity and headroom for additional lighting, or other loads, while still keeping the Battery charged fully (and this has been confirmed by tests and numerous field experiences).

Cheers
I'm aware that my calculation is a bit high for normal use.

Do you happen to know where I can find out the weightings of "intermittent" and "occasional"?

I love to re-invent the wheel - this is after all a hobby!
__________________
1961 Volvo PV544 the quick and easy in between project(!)
1981 Mercedes 300D <=> 230 diesel to petrol conversion project
1965 Series 2a Station Wagon mega build
1992 Mercedes 190E The car that works!
Army is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 20th, 2019, 17:17   #618
harpgirl
Junior Member
 

Last Online: Dec 17th, 2023 10:31
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Shrewsbury
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Army View Post
Whilst I've been busy connecting the dots (so to speak) between each component I'm wiring and joining things up to a fuse box the thought about how much power I'm going to need has suddenly dawned...

But I think because it is all in parallel the total current draw would be 100 amps
Was looking at this earlier and came up with this. Didn't get round to posting it.

As I know no better let's assume your calculations are correct.

Analysing your disaster scenario I believe a few items can be removed as I imagine you'll be pulling over if these are running constantly. Washer -5, horn -10,* brake lights -7 (incl trailer), indicators -10.5 (incl trailer), radio-5 (if you do fit it but imagine if you had power concerns you would turn this off), interior lights-1.5. That is 39 off your 100 leaving 61w consumption. Assuming your alternator is supplying the 55w on the rating then that is a 6w deficit to* come from the battery. You have quite a few hours battery capacity before that becomes an issue and if you can turn off any of rear screen heater, main beam, fog lights you would be back in positive territory and charging the battery.
harpgirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 20th, 2019, 17:34   #619
Ron Kwas
Premier Member
 
Ron Kwas's Avatar
 

Last Online: Today 20:59
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Connecticut, USA
Default

Army;

It's science, but not rocket science...so you can make an informed judgement call (much as the vehicle elec eng would have)...for instance I'd consider the modest current of Directional Indicators and Wipers as somewhere between Continuous, and Intermittent, so weigh them at 50%...High current of Fog or Driving lights, I'd weigh (for the purpose of Charging System sizing) at 80-90%...I'd add in Brake Lights at 20%...again you're making a bit of an academic exercise of this, but the 60A Alt will serve you well. Remember also, that the rated output of Alt is used only when called for...at other times, it is just available and on stand-by, and trickle-charging the Bat.

Cheers
Ron Kwas is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 21st, 2019, 17:28   #620
Army
marches on his stomach
 

Last Online: Feb 11th, 2022 04:15
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Default Something different...

...need to order some more electrical stuff so I've moved back to things I find more enjoyable.

Hashtag PV ZF steering box time (!)

I got the epoxy bearing repair stuff a few weeks back and got round to applying and sanding it yesterday and today.



Epoxy was easy to apply and quite easy to sand but difficult to get the contour correct (of course)



For those of you who may remember removing the old ball bearings from the NLA bearing races was quite straight forward (that was done months ago). I found correct sized replacement ball bearings and fitted them today - just squeezed the bearing race back in place so the balls didn't drop out.

Also easy.



The bottom bearing cup was still available so I bought a new one. I couldn't find the top one for sale so it had to be left in place (but it is much much much better condition than the old lower one).

The bit in my hand in the picture above is actually a spacer washer - the bearing cup is already in there.

Spray on Hylomar =>



Good stuff to use on every side of the shims - should stop leaks for a bit



The steering box is now back together (just need to fit two seals) and then it is more or less done for now.

There are still problems with this part however - the epoxy bearing surface repair has helped - it is way way smoother than before but not as nice as it should be. I'm going to use it as it is for a bit and see if use wears it smooth for me (!)

A bit dodgy - I'm not exactly tickety boo with how it is turned out. I'm going to keep an eye out for another steering box and see if that has better parts in it. (Probably not!)

Worse case scenario - I put in the extra shim like some one did previously to reduce the "correct" pre-load between the two ball bearing races so it feels smoother. I don't really want to do that though as it doesn't help with future wear on that pesky inner shaft...

[To be continued]
__________________
1961 Volvo PV544 the quick and easy in between project(!)
1981 Mercedes 300D <=> 230 diesel to petrol conversion project
1965 Series 2a Station Wagon mega build
1992 Mercedes 190E The car that works!
Army is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 21:37.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.