|
200 Series General Forum for the Volvo 240 and 260 cars |
Information |
|
New (to me) 1980 Volvo 244Views : 2026664 Replies : 4092Users Viewing This Thread : |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
May 27th, 2020, 15:05 | #1151 | |
Premier Member
Last Online: Yesterday 17:55
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Corby del Sol
|
Quote:
I thought the mixture had been adjusted to be just a little too rich (by looking at #1 plug), I don't have a gas analyser so I did it the old fashioned way (that one would have used on a bike in 1977): adjust a little > take on a test ride > have a look at the plug > adjust a bit more. I moved the CO screw 1 hex flat at a time inwards and found the best setting after 3 tests - 3xhex flats or 1/2 turn in from where it had been set. I'm pretty sure I have the compression, ignition and fuel/air mixture spot on now, the Royal Barge is running very nicely with no thermal management issues on a hot day (about 25C I should think). I've noticed the idle speed matches the stall speed of the auto box much better now. I think that was the final piece in getting the Royal Barge running properly - but that doesn't mean I can't make some more improvements from here on. Stay safe, Alan Last edited by Othen; May 27th, 2020 at 15:07. Reason: Spelling error. |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Othen For This Useful Post: |
May 27th, 2020, 18:21 | #1152 | ||
Premier Member
Last Online: Yesterday 20:02
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Lakenheath
|
Quote:
Quote:
How do you mean on the idle and stall speeds? Always good to start from a well running car when making improvements, that way they can be assessed for what they are and not the difference they make to a badly running engine!
__________________
Cheers Dave Next Door to Top-Gun with a Honda CR-V & S Type Jag Volvo gone but not forgotten........ |
||
The Following User Says Thank You to Laird Scooby For This Useful Post: |
May 27th, 2020, 18:59 | #1153 |
VOC Member since 1986
Last Online: Yesterday 23:39
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Leicestershire
|
There is definitely a "sweet" spot regarding tick-over on an auto, Alan, and you have obviously hit upon it!
Your words evoke memories* of balancing brake and gas on a carb fed motor following a cold start. You may well find that it is no longer necessary to slip the 'box into neutral when idling briefly in traffic, either! Regards, John.
__________________
Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana ..... Last edited by john.wigley; May 27th, 2020 at 19:24. Reason: * typo |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to john.wigley For This Useful Post: |
May 27th, 2020, 19:21 | #1154 |
Premier Member
Last Online: Yesterday 17:55
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Corby del Sol
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Othen For This Useful Post: |
May 27th, 2020, 19:31 | #1155 | |
Premier Member
Last Online: Yesterday 17:55
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Corby del Sol
|
Quote:
I'm happy the RB is where it should be (taking into account the later breakerless ignition (good thing)). The one thing that would really improve the Royal Barge is an AW70/71 auto box. At the moment 70 MPH equates to 3750 RPM, which is a mite frantic, with a 4 speeder that would be more like 2250RPM (which would be lovely). Stall speed for the torque converter: engine speed at which it doesn't transmit any forward motion, it feels like about 1000RPM for the BW55. If one can match the engine idle and torque converter speeds then there will be hardly any drag in position D in traffic (although a little bit is convenient). Stay safe, Alan PS. I've been thinking Dave: I'm at a bit of a fork in the road with the Royal Barge project. What is is really short of to make it a fairly modern car is an AW70/71 transmission, but doing that means some fairly fundamental changes: box, prop shaft, speedo, cooling (engine and transmission), as well as probably carburettor and exhaust to take full advantage of the higher gearing). So, I can either decide to do that and make the RB pretty modern, or on the other hand I can tinker with it the way it is and keep it more or less original. I need to have a think about this. It is not really a cost issue (as we discussed the other day the project is well within costs), it is just what I want to end up with. A lot of me likes the RB the way it is, warts and all - but there is a part that would like it the way it should have been (in which case perhaps I should have bought a 1993 car with FI, 4 speed auto box and load of computers!). Last edited by Othen; May 27th, 2020 at 20:08. Reason: Spelling error. |
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Othen For This Useful Post: |
May 27th, 2020, 19:41 | #1156 | |
Premier Member
Last Online: Yesterday 17:55
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Corby del Sol
|
Quote:
The sweet spot idle speed is hard to hit with a carburettor, there are so many variables and very few controls... at the best of times it only gets things more or less right :-) The BW55 3 speeder is absolutely fine around town (fortunately mostly where I use it), but would be a bit low geared for the highway. 70 MPH equates to about 3750RPM, which would be a bit irritating on a long trip. Stay safe, Alan Last edited by Othen; May 27th, 2020 at 19:47. Reason: Spelling error. |
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Othen For This Useful Post: |
May 27th, 2020, 21:57 | #1157 |
VOC Member since 1986
Last Online: Yesterday 23:39
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Leicestershire
|
I think you will find 2250 RPM is on the low side, Alan. My 745, with the four-speed auto box, turned over at 2700 at 70 MPH - still a useful reduction on 3750. As well as a more relaxed drive, you will also benefit from less wear and tear and significantly improved economy (27 vs 24, so I would expect at least a 10% improvement).
If I were you, I would not discount the idea. A popular conversion was to convert an auto car to manual, so you may strike lucky and find a good tranny at a reasonable price. If, despite your best efforts, the R.B.'s tranny were to fail, you might be glad that you did! Regards, John.
__________________
Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana ..... |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to john.wigley For This Useful Post: |
May 27th, 2020, 22:48 | #1158 | |
Premier Member
Last Online: Yesterday 17:55
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Corby del Sol
|
Quote:
It looks like my very rough calculation of gear ratios was a long way out, no matter, 2700RPM at 70MPH waould be lovely. The conversion to the AW71 box looks to have a few problems, this article is quite good (it is for a 260 but I suspect most the issues would be the same): https://forums.tbforums.com/showthread.php?t=332124 I see your point about a manual conversion John, but to make it worthwhile it would have to be to a 5 speeder, which I suspect would have similar problems to the AW71. I quite like an auto box (my other cars are both 6 speed manuals, so I like driving something different in the RB). As I said to Dave above, I’m at a fork in the road with the RB project. I can either modernise it (4 speed auto, plus... where would I stop) or I tinker with it as I have done so far but keep the car more or less standard (maybe I spend some money on a respray to make it look nice instead?). The good thing is the RB is running nicely with the new head, the ignition, fuel and cooling systems all sorted, so I don’t need to make any hasty decision because something has failed. This isn’t really a cost issue - I’m happy to invest a couple of grand in the RB project. Stay safe, Alan Last edited by Othen; May 27th, 2020 at 22:54. Reason: Spelling error. |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Othen For This Useful Post: |
May 27th, 2020, 22:57 | #1159 | |
Premier Member
Last Online: Yesterday 20:02
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Lakenheath
|
Quote:
Stall speed - go for a drive and get the engine and gearbox warmed up. Pull the handbrake on as hard as you can andstand on the footbrake with your left foot. Put it in to "D" and stand on the loud pedal with your right foot. Note the tacho rading, should be around 2100-2300rpm on most models. Don't exceed 10seconds for this test. You've just measured the stall speed. "I'm at a bit of a fork in the road with the Royal Barge project. What is is really short of to make it a fairly modern car is an AW70/71 transmission, but doing that means some fairly fundamental changes: box, prop shaft, speedo, cooling (engine and transmission), as well as probably carburettor and exhaust to take full advantage of the higher gearing). So, I can either decide to do that and make the RB pretty modern, or on the other hand I can tinker with it the way it is and keep it more or less original. I need to have a think about this. It is not really a cost issue (as we discussed the other day the project is well within costs), it is just what I want to end up with. A lot of me likes the RB the way it is, warts and all - but there is a part that would like it the way it should have been " That tells me you're not really in a fork in the road Alan. Sorry if that sounds contrary to your opening gambit but i can definitely relate to it and for me, it was more a case of "Am i doing the right thing?" The answer was staring me in the face as i'm sure it will do to you when you find it but perhaps for different reasons. Why did you buy the RB in the first place? Because it was a car you owned many moons ago (not necessarily the same car but the same model) and back then, it wouldn't have been out of place to have 3750rpm showing on the tacho at motorway speeds. However, times have moved on and it now stands out like a sore thumb that it needs an overdrive. What are the alternatives? By a 740 auto to gain a car that has overdrive as standard? A 740GLE with K-Jetronic (mechanical) fuel injection, B230E engine and a 4 speed auto would be the nearest equivalent unless you could find a carb version which are rare. It's not a 240 though. You bought a 240 because that was the car you wanted. Now you want a little more, the car that Volvo should have made first time round, correct? I know you would regret selling it, especially if you sold it to buy a 740GLE that turned out to be a big disappointment. I suspect you would also regret not upgrading the transmission, as i think you would grow to resent the need for ear defenders on the motorway. Now for the mods, the cooling system and separate ATF cooler is something i think you should do regardless to protect the auto box. I've already done my Sterling and when i find a good manual rad for my 760, that will be following suit. As previously mentioned, i'm fairly sure the propshaft from the donor vehicle will be a match for your AW70, i'll try to make some enquiries tomorrow to find the length of the AW70 box and propshaft, i remember in the HBoF for the 140 series, there was a chart with the lengths of the propshafts and which gearboxes they were designed for. I'm fairly certain there are some AW70s with a speedo drive built in so that can be overcome as well. Once fitted, the gearbox will be unseen but you will have the overdrive available to you from about 40-50mph upwards. From the outside, nobody will be any the wiser but you will know. As for the exhaust and carb mods, i would wait until you've done the gearbox, you may find that the engine handles it fine without needing anything extra. That said, the manifold might be a good move, purely for longevity and the Weber might improve town driving and when you need extra power, definitely improve that. Thing is, this will eat away at you until you do something about it. Far better to take the bull by the horns and find a gearbox, propshaft etc, Weber and manifold and stainless exhaust manifold and do it, maybe over winter. In case you're wondering how i can relate to this, i've had my ROver 12 years now. When i first got it, the intention was to keep it as original as possible, with a few minor exceptions. However, with the parts supply i sonn became faced with two options. First was put it off the road untl the corect part became available - not really an option as i wanted to be able to use it. The second was invent, adapt, modify other parts to overcome the problems. First major problem was the coolant expansion tank. The majority of the Mk2 tanks were made with a mix of virgin polymer and regrind polymer so after a few years, they started breaking up, leaking, cracking and weren't reliable. That's a late 90s Volvo expansion tank, i believe i was the first in the UK to do this, about the same time, someone in Australia did it and apparently posted the details online (i didn't have internet at the time) but it is now not only an accepted but (dare i say it) desirable modification as it eliminates a big reliability problem. Next major problem was a certain chain of tyre fitting places who shall remain nameless but their initials are ATS wrecked the alloy wheels by using windy guns to remove/refit the nuts. Those are 1998-02 Volvo x40 Telesto wheels. This was the point when i got to the stage where i had to decide whether to endeavour to get things back to original or go the whole hog and make it the car Rover should have built. It was about this time that the Channel 4 program, "Inside Rolls-Royce" with the story of the Phantom Celestial, the showcase 10th year anniversary one-off model was first shown. Watching that gave me the inspiration to make my Rover into something similar, in spirit at least. Since then, various other minor mods/improvements have followed including (but not limited to) an interior retrim with extra soundproofing and my latest modification, a proper chrome grille with horizontal slats instead of vertical : Probably a "Marmite thing" but i like it, hand built as well! I hope you see from that i get where you're coming from, i honestly think you'll regret it if you don't go for at least the AW70 but if you decide not to, that's fine too. In my view, adding the mods is like having a new car, just the same as the old one but better with all the good bits retained and the bad bits improved.
__________________
Cheers Dave Next Door to Top-Gun with a Honda CR-V & S Type Jag Volvo gone but not forgotten........ |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Laird Scooby For This Useful Post: |
May 27th, 2020, 22:58 | #1160 |
VOC Member since 1986
Last Online: Yesterday 23:39
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Leicestershire
|
Sorry, Alan, I wasn't suggesting for one moment that you convert TO a manual! Far from it, I was thinking more that you may be able to pick up a good auto box from someone who has already carried that conversion and been unable to sell the auto box that they had removed.
Regards, John.
__________________
Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana ..... |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to john.wigley For This Useful Post: |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|