Volvo Community Forum. The Forums of the Volvo Owners Club

Forum Rules Volvo Owners Club About VOC Volvo Gallery Links Volvo History Volvo Press
Go Back   Volvo Owners Club Forum > "Technical Topics" > 200 Series General
Register Members Cars Help Calendar Extra Stuff

Notices

200 Series General Forum for the Volvo 240 and 260 cars

Information
  • VOC Members: There is no login facility using your VOC membership number or the details from page 3 of the club magazine. You need to register in the normal way
  • AOL Customers: Make sure you check the 'Remember me' check box otherwise the AOL system may log you out during the session. This is a known issue with AOL.
  • AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net users. Forum owners such as us are finding that AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net are blocking a lot of email generated from forums. This may mean your registration activation and other emails will not get to you, or they may appear in your spam mailbox

Thread Informations

Which was the best red block engine?

Views : 13116

Replies : 15

Users Viewing This Thread :  

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Feb 3rd, 2014, 23:21   #1
qwertyuiopseb
Sebtacular
 
qwertyuiopseb's Avatar
 

Last Online: Mar 23rd, 2016 01:34
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Hobart
Default Which was the best red block engine?

Very straight forward - with your experiences and your knowledge, etc I'd like to know which was the best of the volvo red block engines fitted through the 70's (or whenever they were first made, feel free to give me a history lesson) to the 90's or so. I know they were fitted in 200's 700's and 900's! But which was the best? ---- Just so you know I beleive I have the B23? It's 2.3 L, 4 cyl. Fuel injected with mechanics and not black boxes!
__________________
___________________________________________
240 Est. 2.3l '84 Aus
qwertyuiopseb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 4th, 2014, 11:06   #2
DW42
Senior Member
 

Last Online: Oct 9th, 2022 04:41
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Currumbin, Queensland
Default

I've had a B20A, B20E, B200E and B230F. I like the B230F the best. I like the diagnostics on the injection -- I bought the car from someone who didn't understand the LH 2.4 diagnostics, and I was able to find out straight away that the O2 sensor was not plugged in, and the coolant temp sensor wasn't working. It also gets better mpg than the others I've owned. The worst thing about it is that it has mild piston slap for the first few minutes after a cold start. It's not getting any worse, but doesn't sound very classy. My 1971 B20A 144, although good looking, didn't like uphill on-ramps or cruising at 70mph.
__________________
Present: 1990 240GL saloon, 1992 240 estate
Past: 1988 240GL; 1971 144DL; 1972 145DL
DW42 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 4th, 2014, 11:23   #3
loki_the_glt
Torquemeister
 
loki_the_glt's Avatar
 

Last Online: Today 17:44
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Asgard, Cheshire
Default Imho

For ease of owner-servicing it has to be the B21/B23 unit: conventional adjustment of accessory belts (big lever then tighten up the adjustment) and half a dozen small bolts holding the crankshaft pulley.
Power-wise, among the normally aspirated ones probably the B23E and early B230E with 140BHP; torque-wise the later B230E.
Personally I'd love a 2.5litre Penta that had never seen salt-water, but that isn't going to happen.
__________________
loki_the_glt - Skipper of the Exxon Valdez, driver of Sweden's finest sporting saloon - and pining for another Slant-4.

loki_the_glt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 4th, 2014, 11:39   #4
heckflosse
Premier Member
 

Last Online: Oct 28th, 2023 12:30
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: dereham
Default

No takers for the gutless mid eighties B200K in a 240 with a Renix ,useless carb and all?
or the lumpy old 230KH with gargling EGR junk?
Or that 16V 234F that revved but had no real oomph in normal use?
Not all of the classic engines were that brilliant.

Got to be an on song 230E .
James.
heckflosse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 4th, 2014, 11:39   #5
Stephen Edwin
Premier Member
 

Last Online: Oct 26th, 2023 20:42
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Thurrock
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by loki_the_glt View Post
For ease of owner-servicing it has to be the B21/B23 unit: conventional adjustment of accessory belts (big lever then tighten up the adjustment) and half a dozen small bolts holding the crankshaft pulley.
Power-wise, among the normally aspirated ones probably the B23E and early B230E with 140BHP; torque-wise the later B230E.
Personally I'd love a 2.5litre Penta that had never seen salt-water, but that isn't going to happen.

Re the crankshaft pulley, the tool to hold the crankshaft to undo the single bolt version is not much cost, under £30 if I remember correctly, and it can be re-used and eventually sold. And each new bolt is currently available for less than £7.

Which engine to choose? Sorry, I don't know. But that comment re torque would be important in my opinion. B230E.

I hanker after a pre-electronics engine ....

Last edited by Stephen Edwin; Feb 4th, 2014 at 11:41.
Stephen Edwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 4th, 2014, 11:59   #6
DionBullock
Volvo Nut
 
DionBullock's Avatar
 

Last Online: Apr 18th, 2022 17:42
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Bangor, Gwynedd
Default

Am I right in thinking my '87 GLT has the B230E?? or B23E?? anyway, It's nice and torquey
DionBullock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 4th, 2014, 17:13   #7
wooble
Stay gold baby!
 

Last Online: Jul 24th, 2022 16:15
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Bristol
Default

Define 'best'? The last of the first generation redblocks were the strongest from the factory, with the B23ET coming standard with forged crank, rods and pistons. The last of the second generation were more efficient and 99% as strong, as well as benefiting from modern EFI and 20 years of development. The B230ET from the 740TIC was among the weakest, but made the most power from the factory. The 16 valve engines were the most technically advanced and got better power and economy than the 8 valve engines, but less forgiving of deferred maintenance and developed a reputation for being 'unreliable'.

There's no really 'bad' choice to make, but the mid-80s redblocks come close, more because of questionable choices in carbs and ignition than anything else.

I'll do a slightly more in-depth rundown later. of course, there's no definitive guide even that way, as volvo played mix n' match with differently specced engines between world markets.
wooble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 4th, 2014, 23:40   #8
loki_the_glt
Torquemeister
 
loki_the_glt's Avatar
 

Last Online: Today 17:44
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Asgard, Cheshire
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DionBullock View Post
Am I right in thinking my '87 GLT has the B230E?? or B23E?? anyway, It's nice and torquey
It should be a B230E - look at the crankshaft pulley and if there's a set of small bolts around it then it's a B23E (or possibly a B21E if someone's been really naughty...) otherwise it's a B230E (or B200E as per my previous parenthetical comment).
__________________
loki_the_glt - Skipper of the Exxon Valdez, driver of Sweden's finest sporting saloon - and pining for another Slant-4.

loki_the_glt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 5th, 2014, 05:02   #9
qwertyuiopseb
Sebtacular
 
qwertyuiopseb's Avatar
 

Last Online: Mar 23rd, 2016 01:34
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Hobart
Default

Thanks everyone for speedy and detailed replies, I really love volvo forums uk.

Hmmm... It would seem that people don't like 80's red blocks.. Oh well at least mine's got fuel injection, and back to the thingo about electronic fuel injection I think mechanical is probably better because from where I come from to replace a black box costs about £600 or so.. (Tasmania)

Define best.... I want to know what you think is best, but what I think is best is something that is reliable, easy to fix and maintain yet has a bit of grunt... still, on a 30 year old car I'd have to say that the first two are on the top of my list.

I'm glad to hear your opinions and I will take them into account

However, on an unrelated topic, any thing I should know about Volvo 360's?
By this I mean engine choice, trim options, if rust could be an issue, if there were ever common major problems with them... I'm thinking of buying one when I have money etc.. And just by the way I live in the state Tasmania in Australia so 360's are rare and the only brought them in for a few years.


Thanks guys!

p.s, red blocks with turbo? reliable? fast?
__________________
___________________________________________
240 Est. 2.3l '84 Aus
qwertyuiopseb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 5th, 2014, 08:19   #10
Clifford Pope
Not an expert but ...
 

Last Online: Today 17:48
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Boncath
Default

2.3 litres are much nicer to drive than 2.1 or 2.0. You don't notice till you own one, then you suddenly realise how gutless the smaller ones are. Even to a mimsing driver like me.
Clifford Pope is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
240, engine, red block


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 19:52.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.