Volvo Community Forum. The Forums of the Volvo Owners Club

Forum Rules Volvo Owners Club About VOC Volvo Gallery Links Volvo History Volvo Press
Go Back   Volvo Owners Club Forum > "Technical Topics" > PV, 120 (Amazon), 1800 General

Notices

PV, 120 (Amazon), 1800 General Forum for the Volvo PV, 120 and 1800 cars

Information
  • VOC Members: There is no login facility using your VOC membership number or the details from page 3 of the club magazine. You need to register in the normal way
  • AOL Customers: Make sure you check the 'Remember me' check box otherwise the AOL system may log you out during the session. This is a known issue with AOL.
  • AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net users. Forum owners such as us are finding that AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net are blocking a lot of email generated from forums. This may mean your registration activation and other emails will not get to you, or they may appear in your spam mailbox

Thread Informations

Ride height

Views : 2389

Replies : 21

Users Viewing This Thread :  

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Apr 3rd, 2022, 18:21   #1
Rustinmotion
Senior Member
 

Last Online: Today 16:21
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: MILTON KEYNES
Default Ride height

How or where do you check ride height on an Amazon wagon? Is there a factory check point ?
Rustinmotion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 10th, 2022, 10:59   #2
classicswede
Trader Volvo in my veins
 
classicswede's Avatar
 

Last Online: Yesterday 21:53
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Anglesey
Default

Measure from the centre of the grease cap to the lip of the wheel arch
classicswede is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 10th, 2022, 12:55   #3
Derek UK
VOC Member
 
Derek UK's Avatar
 

Last Online: Today 17:06
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chatham
Default

According to the Autocar road test ground clearance at the front cross member is 7". At the back axle I think it is 9". Springs sag with age.
Dai's method or from the centre of the arch to the ground is fine for checking but only if you know what that measurement should be!
Derek UK is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 10th, 2022, 15:53   #4
c1800
Master Member
 

Last Online: Apr 14th, 2024 16:22
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Alberta
Default

One reference point in this.

https://volvoamazonpictures.se/docum...s/volvo220.pdf
c1800 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 11th, 2022, 19:43   #5
Rustinmotion
Senior Member
 

Last Online: Today 16:21
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: MILTON KEYNES
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by c1800 View Post
Using the load height dimension I'm sitting 90mm lower than standard on 40mm lowering springs I'm not unhappy with how it sits just surprised as it does not look over lowered think il check tyres for diameter but I can't see it making 50mm difference
Rustinmotion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 11th, 2022, 23:54   #6
classicswede
Trader Volvo in my veins
 
classicswede's Avatar
 

Last Online: Yesterday 21:53
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Anglesey
Default

My method takes out any variation is tyre size and tyre pressure.

Off the top of my head the original dimension is 460mm but don't hold me to it
classicswede is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 12th, 2022, 07:21   #7
Rustinmotion
Senior Member
 

Last Online: Today 16:21
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: MILTON KEYNES
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by classicswede View Post
My method takes out any variation is tyre size and tyre pressure.

Off the top of my head the original dimension is 460mm but don't hold me to it
Mine is 350 at the front and 360 at the rear so 100mm lower than standard which kind of agrees with the load height dimension
What else is in play other than springs? Mine are new 40mm lowered so not expecting spring sag.
I went for minus 40 as nothing else needed altering, given it's sitting 90 to 100mm lower should I look at shocks and sway bar?
Rustinmotion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 12th, 2022, 07:59   #8
Othen
Premier Member
 
Othen's Avatar
 

Last Online: Today 06:15
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Corby del Sol
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Derek UK View Post
According to the Autocar road test ground clearance at the front cross member is 7". At the back axle I think it is 9". Springs sag with age.
Dai's method or from the centre of the arch to the ground is fine for checking but only if you know what that measurement should be!
Quote:
Originally Posted by c1800 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rustinmotion View Post
Mine is 350 at the front and 360 at the rear so 100mm lower than standard which kind of agrees with the load height dimension
What else is in play other than springs? Mine are new 40mm lowered so not expecting spring sag.
I went for minus 40 as nothing else needed altering, given it's sitting 90 to 100mm lower should I look at shocks and sway bar?
Something doesn't quite make sense here. The OP says his motor car is sitting 100mm (4") lower than standard, but according to Derek UK that would mean the front cross member is stet 3" from the ground. Unless the OP has some very small wheels or very low profile tyres that surely cannot be the case. 3" ground clearance would be very ZZ Top - and probably wouldn't clear most sleeping policemen.

I can't help thinking the OP must have measured something wrong - I'd suggest taking a reading to the roof height (or any other reference) given in the link to the specification that C1800 has provided above.

The shock absorbers and anti-roll bars will not affect the ride height OP. I'm not sure lowering cars ever makes much sense (but that is a personal view) - but that is up to you OP. Did you take any measurements of the ride height before you fitted the 40mm shorter springs?

Some photos would help to envisage the problem OP.

:-)

Alan
__________________
... another lovely day in paradise.
Othen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 12th, 2022, 11:27   #9
Derek UK
VOC Member
 
Derek UK's Avatar
 

Last Online: Today 17:06
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chatham
Default

Well, you would think that springs that are made to lower the car 40mm would do actually that, so with 40mm being about 1 1/2" the ground clearance would then be about 5 1/2".
Derek UK is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 12th, 2022, 12:42   #10
Othen
Premier Member
 
Othen's Avatar
 

Last Online: Today 06:15
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Corby del Sol
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Derek UK View Post
Well, you would think that springs that are made to lower the car 40mm would do actually that, so with 40mm being about 1 1/2" the ground clearance would then be about 5 1/2".
Of course, but the OP says his motor car sits 100mm, or 4" lower, the shorter springs only account for 1 1/2", so there is 2 1/2" unaccounted for.

It seems unlikely (to me) that ground clearance to the front cross member can be only 3". VW Golf drivers might disagree with me, but I think any motor car that low would have trouble driving on normal roads.

:-)
__________________
... another lovely day in paradise.

Last edited by Othen; Apr 12th, 2022 at 12:46.
Othen is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:31.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.