Volvo Community Forum. The Forums of the Volvo Owners Club

Forum Rules Volvo Owners Club About VOC Volvo Gallery Links Volvo History Volvo Press
Go Back   Volvo Owners Club Forum > "Technical Topics" > V40/XC '12>17 General

Notices

Information
  • VOC Members: There is no login facility using your VOC membership number or the details from page 3 of the club magazine. You need to register in the normal way
  • AOL Customers: Make sure you check the 'Remember me' check box otherwise the AOL system may log you out during the session. This is a known issue with AOL.
  • AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net users. Forum owners such as us are finding that AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net are blocking a lot of email generated from forums. This may mean your registration activation and other emails will not get to you, or they may appear in your spam mailbox

Thread Informations

Petrol Engine Confusion

Views : 1352

Replies : 8

Users Viewing This Thread :  

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Jun 10th, 2017, 09:45   #1
stoat
New Member
 

Last Online: Dec 11th, 2017 14:14
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Tunbridge Wells
Default Petrol Engine Confusion

Hi

I'm new to Volvo but am thinking about buying a petrol V40, I've test driven a 2014/15 1.6l T2 which I liked, but have noticed there are also 2.0l T2's which appear to be the same power (122bhp), economy, tax band etc, the only difference seems to be the higher insurance group. The current Volvo brochure doesn't seem to mention the 1.6, so I'm guessing the 1.6l was replaced by the 2.0l, but why would they replace the engine with what seems to be a less efficient one?

Is there any advantage of the 2.0l over the 1.6l?

Thanks!
stoat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 10th, 2017, 11:23   #2
steV50
Senior Member
 

Last Online: Yesterday 19:48
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Dorset
Default

The 2.0L T2 engine from 2016 model year is a Volvo engine with a Volvo gearbox whereas the old 1.6L is I believe a Ford eco boost engine and gearbox.

I have a 2016 V40 with the new T2 engine and it pulls very well, averages around 40 mpg but can get high 40's on a longer run.

I have not driven a 1.6L T2 so cannot compare the two engines but given the choice I would go for the 2.0L Volvo motor. I have not read anything on here though about any issues with the 1.6L.

As for the insurance the V40 is about £100 less a year than my old V50 1.6 diesel so I doubt if there would be that much of a difference between the two T2 engines.
steV50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 12th, 2017, 13:29   #3
stoat
New Member
 

Last Online: Dec 11th, 2017 14:14
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Tunbridge Wells
Default

Thanks for the information, this is kind of what I suspected may have happened, finding out for sure turned out to be more difficult than I thought.

Not sure if this is completely true but my initial investigation suggested that the 1.6l T2 was group 18 insurance, but the 2.0l T2 was group 24 - which is mad because they are both 122bhp. Getting quotes from the same insurer added £100/year.

But you're right, should really drive a 2.0l before deciding.

Thanks
stoat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 22nd, 2017, 22:11   #4
T5R92011
FCW Auto Service
 
T5R92011's Avatar
 

Last Online: Yesterday 21:51
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Gloucester
Default

I'd always take a Volvo engine over a Ford engine where possible.

Not saying ford engine's are bad, but Volvo makes particularly strong engines.
__________________
FCW Auto Service (Gloucester)
https://www.fcw-autoservice.com
T5R92011 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 26th, 2017, 20:28   #5
7050man
Master Member
 

Last Online: Jan 25th, 2019 17:19
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kent
Default

Just to add to confusion, T3 my16 with geartronic gearbox is only a 1.5ltr engine with same power as man 2.0Ltr T3.
7050man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 26th, 2017, 20:46   #6
Clan
Experienced Member
 
Clan's Avatar
 

Last Online: Yesterday 22:03
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: L/H side
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 7050man View Post
Just to add to confusion, T3 my16 with geartronic gearbox is only a 1.5ltr engine with same power as man 2.0Ltr T3.
I'm eagerly awaiting the 3 cylinder 1500 180 bhp petrol engine to add more confusion ..

remember all these new petrol engines are GDI technology - Direct injection into the combustion chamber like a diesel .
__________________
My comments are only based on my opinions and vast experience .
Clan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 6th, 2017, 13:17   #7
tomweston
Member
 

Last Online: Aug 26th, 2019 10:17
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Knutsford
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clan View Post
I'm eagerly awaiting the 3 cylinder 1500 180 bhp petrol engine to add more confusion ..

remember all these new petrol engines are GDI technology - Direct injection into the combustion chamber like a diesel .
I had an S40, older model which was a 1.8GDI (Mitsubishi) engine, worked great until the injection system failed at 105K miles.
tomweston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 6th, 2017, 22:01   #8
Clan
Experienced Member
 
Clan's Avatar
 

Last Online: Yesterday 22:03
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: L/H side
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tomweston View Post
I had an S40, older model which was a 1.8GDI (Mitsubishi) engine, worked great until the injection system failed at 105K miles.
Just about every new petrol engined car on the road now is GDI,
__________________
My comments are only based on my opinions and vast experience .
Clan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 8th, 2017, 07:58   #9
I-S
Premier Member
 

Last Online: Jul 22nd, 2021 23:43
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Huddersfield
Default

There are significant differences (thankfully!) between current direct-injection methodologies and Mitsubishi's abortive GDI tech.

Currently, direct injection is used to give higher accuracy of fuel delivery, more precisely delivering the correct stoichiometric air-fuel mixture (AFR 14.7:1), in order to give lower emissions.

Mitsubishi GDI was quite different. It was designed in order to precisely place the fuel charge in the cylinder with carefully shaped pistons in order to allow a "lean burn"mode with AFR as high as 40:1, as well as unusually high compression ratio. This lead to issues with coking (as the high afr leads to soot) and high NOX emissions (which they developed a special catalyst for in Japan, but the sulphur in European fuel poisoned the catalyst, so they had to detune the engines a lot and install a different catalyst.

The benefit was that if you could keep it in the lean-burn mode then it was quite fuel efficient - I managed over 50mpg on one 150 mile motorway run in my Mitsubishi Galant 2.4 GDI. There were too many downsides, and with tightening emissions legislation the whole concept of lean-burn petrol engines was dropped.
I-S is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:03.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.