|
S40 / V40 '96-'04 General Forum for the Volvo S40 and V40 (Classic) Series from 1995-2004. |
Information |
|
V40 2001 - should it stay or should it go...Views : 898 Replies : 12Users Viewing This Thread : |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Nov 1st, 2017, 22:56 | #1 |
New Member
Last Online: Nov 6th, 2017 23:24
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: London
|
V40 2001 - should it stay or should it go...
Yes, it's a new account... I've not needed to post here before...
I have a 2001 Y-reg V40 currently sitting in an small independent garage. It went in to have an odd noise checked out, and we determined it needed a new alternator - that's been done. However, more problems have come to light. The timing belt was seizing and the mechanic has had to cut that off and replace it. Now though he says it makes a noise when running that 100% indicates the valves have become bent / damaged. He has quoted me £325 for the parts required, £75 for the timing of the new belt / valves to be sorted (this involves sending it away), and £200 for his labour. This is on top of paying for the new alternator and labour for that. So I'm now in the spot of deciding whether to go ahead with this.. or to cut my losses and maybe offer the v40 up on this forum for a new home. Any advice gratefully received! Any questions - fire away! I'll answer what I can... |
Nov 1st, 2017, 22:58 | #2 |
Master Member
Last Online: Yesterday 19:13
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: York/Selby
|
What sort of noise is it making?
__________________
'08 V50 2.0D |
Nov 1st, 2017, 23:15 | #3 |
New Member
Last Online: Nov 6th, 2017 23:24
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: London
|
Good question - and I'm afraid I don't know. I briefly visited after work to talk over what was needed and so on, and the mechanic tried to get it to over - but it wouldn't. Like the battery is now flat too...
If it is damaged / bent valves - what kind of noise would that be? If we get it turning over on another visit. |
The Following User Says Thank You to faultyvolvo For This Useful Post: |
Nov 2nd, 2017, 05:03 | #4 | |
Premier Member
Last Online: May 2nd, 2018 08:14
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: DownSouth
|
Quote:
If that is the case, I would sell it for parts unless the rest of the car is a real gem, or even just walk away if you have not paid for the Recon alternator. The phase 1 V40's are worth less than the phase 2's and even with a phase 2 I would think three times before paying for an engine rebuild.
__________________
2003 V40 1.9TD Mods: Scratches, bent bumpers, raised REAR mats & internal mud guards. SHELL ULTRA 5/40 & LIQUI MOLY CERATEC. Everyone should DYOR (Do Your Own Research) Last edited by skyship007; Nov 2nd, 2017 at 05:05. |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to skyship007 For This Useful Post: |
Nov 2nd, 2017, 05:45 | #5 |
Non Fragile
Last Online: Oct 13th, 2023 05:46
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Chadderton, Oldham
|
Hmm. The way I figure it; If the valves were bent before the mechanic got hold of it, you'd know. It wouldn't be making a little noise, it'd sound like something metallic and broken, and likely would be very "lumpy" running, have little power and feel as if one cylinder wasn't firing.
A belt isn't "siezing", it's just a belt. It's either siezed or it isn't, and how can a belt seize anyway? In any case, there isn't any reason to cut off the timing belt to replace an alternator, as it is driven by the auxillary belt, the timing belt should have been left well alone. Removing the timing belt without locking the camshafts is not something a competant mechanic would do. So I'm inclined to think this mechanic has caused the problem. I'd be very suspicious of this guy. P.S. Is he trying to turn it over on the starter motor? Without a timing belt? Is he mad? Last edited by canis; Nov 2nd, 2017 at 05:48. |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to canis For This Useful Post: |
Nov 2nd, 2017, 09:36 | #6 | |
New Member
Last Online: Nov 6th, 2017 23:24
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: London
|
Quote:
|
|
Nov 2nd, 2017, 09:40 | #7 | ||
New Member
Last Online: Nov 6th, 2017 23:24
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: London
|
Quote:
Quote:
Thanks for another helpful reply, though! |
||
The Following User Says Thank You to faultyvolvo For This Useful Post: |
Nov 2nd, 2017, 10:51 | #8 |
Premier Member
Last Online: Jan 3rd, 2024 14:43
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Toronto Canada
|
Did he ask your permission before cutting the “timing belt? I’m a bit stumped if he did not. Certainly one would need to remove the aux belt to work on the alternator but he would have know that cutting the timing belt would have forced you to undertake more work on the spot. How was the car driving before the alternator went?
__________________
2003 V40 1.9T B4204T4, 197,000miles (sold but alive!), 2004 S60 2.5T, 160,000miles, 2010 V70 3.2, 125,000miles, 2002 V70XC 2.4, 175,000miles Click here for my x40 and V70 P3 repair guides |
The Following User Says Thank You to pierremcalpine For This Useful Post: |
Nov 2nd, 2017, 17:28 | #9 | |
New Member
Last Online: Nov 6th, 2017 23:24
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: London
|
Quote:
The car was driving fine before my initial "odd noise". That was deemed to be the alternator's belt wheel coming loose on its axle, and striking the ECU. That aux belt was also in a bad way. |
|
Nov 2nd, 2017, 18:00 | #10 |
Premier Member
Last Online: Jan 3rd, 2024 14:43
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Toronto Canada
|
Sounds like you are being played. There is no reason for him to have cut the timing belt. I'd be very skeptical of anything he has to say. Take the vehicle some place else, even if it means having to tow it out.
__________________
2003 V40 1.9T B4204T4, 197,000miles (sold but alive!), 2004 S60 2.5T, 160,000miles, 2010 V70 3.2, 125,000miles, 2002 V70XC 2.4, 175,000miles Click here for my x40 and V70 P3 repair guides |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to pierremcalpine For This Useful Post: |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|