Volvo Community Forum. The Forums of the Volvo Owners Club

Forum Rules Volvo Owners Club About VOC Volvo Gallery Links Volvo History Volvo Press
Go Back   Volvo Owners Club Forum > "Technical Topics" > Diesel Engines
Register Members Cars Help Calendar Extra Stuff

Notices

Diesel Engines A forum dedicated to diesel engines fitted to Volvo cars. See the first post in this forum for a list of the diesel engines.

Information
  • VOC Members: There is no login facility using your VOC membership number or the details from page 3 of the club magazine. You need to register in the normal way
  • AOL Customers: Make sure you check the 'Remember me' check box otherwise the AOL system may log you out during the session. This is a known issue with AOL.
  • AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net users. Forum owners such as us are finding that AOL, Yahoo and Plus.net are blocking a lot of email generated from forums. This may mean your registration activation and other emails will not get to you, or they may appear in your spam mailbox

Thread Informations

Fuel correction figures D5

Views : 5477

Replies : 14

Users Viewing This Thread :  

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Sep 10th, 2015, 16:53   #1
italian job
Member
 

Last Online: Feb 18th, 2018 12:38
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Belper
Default Fuel correction figures D5

Can you give me your views on these please?
Just a little info,2005 163Bhp 150000 miles currently using more fuel than normal,down on power a little,the odd puff of black smoke evident when towing/working hard,something definitely amiss at the moment.
1. 7.01mm3
2. 5.56mm3
3. 6.07mm3
4. 0
5. 33.73mm3

I haven't done a leak back check yet,that's tomorrows job.
When you do the correction check on Vida it says that 0 is the preferred value,anything above plus or minus 3mm3 indicates problems,so according to that 4 out of 5 of my injectors! Including no1 which was an expensive replacement from volvo within the last 2 years.
Cheers Paul

Last edited by italian job; Sep 10th, 2015 at 16:55. Reason: spelling
italian job is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 10th, 2015, 20:24   #2
5cilinder
Premier Member
 
5cilinder's Avatar
 

Last Online: Today 04:48
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Groningen
Default

Do the leakback test , they will confirm those high correction figures
No problems with starting?
5cilinder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 10th, 2015, 20:37   #3
outnumbered
Lunatic from Wakefield
 
outnumbered's Avatar
 

Last Online: Apr 16th, 2023 06:33
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: wakefield
Default

Hi Paul,
this is the screen shot of the 163 when i had it
Attached Images
File Type: jpg mick 4-001.jpg (181.1 KB, 207 views)
__________________
2012 volvo xc90 Executive
Buccaneer Bermuda 2021
outnumbered is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 10th, 2015, 21:51   #4
Element888
Member
 

Last Online: Dec 28th, 2022 20:01
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Norfolk
Default

Fuel correction readings through VIDA on EURO 3 and EURO 4 engines will be complete different. When I checked my friends readings on EURO 3 - they were same as yours - No. 4 - 0 no 5 - 5x more than usual. Still driving with no issues and pulls like a train. I have no explanation for this. But your case might be different.
Element888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 11th, 2015, 06:18   #5
italian job
Member
 

Last Online: Feb 18th, 2018 12:38
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Belper
Default

Thanks all for replying and for the comparison results...yes mine has always been more difficult to start when hot,you have to catch it on the accelerator,i still haven't got to the bottom of that.
I'll update when i have done the leak back.

Cheers Paul.
italian job is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to italian job For This Useful Post:
Old Sep 11th, 2015, 16:50   #6
brickman
Premier Member
 

Last Online: Nov 14th, 2023 10:40
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Glasgow
Default

Not sure if its just an anomoly in VIDA/VOLFCR but my older D5252t (pre-D5 cast iron VAG lump) is not common rail and yet has correction values appearing in the field, not dissimilar to yours. But there is no way of changing it (electronically or mechanically as the pump cannot be adjusted in such a way).
__________________
brickman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 30th, 2015, 20:10   #7
italian job
Member
 

Last Online: Feb 18th, 2018 12:38
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Belper
Default

Just to update,did the leak back test,no1 injector was the worse,thats the one I bought from Volvo,has always suffered from injector "clacking" sinse fitment.Swapped for used replacement now much quieter. Swapped no5 just to see if it would have any effect on correction figures.....not a bit,so not sure what that's all about.

Paul.
italian job is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 1st, 2016, 23:41   #8
Dancake
Premier Member
 

Last Online: Today 09:06
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Belfast
Default

I know this is an old thread, but I done the VIDA injector test today and here are the results

Combustion test
Cylinder 1 - 706rpm
Cylinder 2 - 700rpm
Cylinder 3 - 702rpm
Cylinder 4 - 688rpm
Cylinder 5 - 700rpm

Compression test
Cylinder 1 - 195rpm
Cylinder 2 - 196rpm
Cylinder 3 - 194rpm
Cylinder 4 - 182rpm
Cylinder 5 - 195rpm

When doing the fuel correction test, a reading outside the permissable parameters (3.00mm3 or -3.00mm3 per injector) indicates a problem with that injector. The ideal reading should be 0.00mm3, which contradicts my theory that injector 4 is faulty. According to these test results, 4 out of 5 injectors are faulty

Fuel correction test
Cylinder 1 - 7.00 mm3
Cylinder 2 - 6.58 mm3
Cylinder 3 - 6.03 mm3
Cylinder 4 - 0.00 mm3
Cylinder 5 - 34.82 mm3

I also done a leak back test. Injector number 4 was leaking back more fuel than the others, though injector 5 wasn't too far behind. Going to try a diesel purge before taking the readings again. Should be interesting. At the minute though it's looking like injector 4 is the culprit. Tomorrows live data tests should hopefully confirm my suspicions beyond doubt. I am hoping the lower compression and combustion figures of cylinder 4 are as a result of a faulty injector and not a valve.
__________________
1996 850 T5 - Sold
2003 S40 1.9d - Sold
2004 S60 D5
Dancake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3rd, 2016, 22:47   #9
GrahamBrown1
VOC Member
 

Last Online: Today 10:26
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: North Yorkshire
Default

They are all out of spec by a long way baring number 4. If number 4 is leaking back to much then I would say your looking at a full set replacement here. You also need to check the electrical connections and wiring for corrosion or damage.
__________________
Previous -03 S40, 04 V70 D5, 04 V70 D5 Sport, 05 V50, 07 S60 D5, 09 V70 D5 R design, 12 XC60 DrivE, 15 V60 D3

Current- 05 XC90 D5 Exec, 12 XC70 D4 AWD Se Lux, 14 S80 D3 Se Lux
GrahamBrown1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 12th, 2016, 00:37   #10
Fearone
Junior Member
 

Last Online: Feb 19th, 2018 13:38
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Lancashire
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dancake View Post
I know this is an old thread, but I done the VIDA injector test today and here are the results

Combustion test
Cylinder 1 - 706rpm
Cylinder 2 - 700rpm
Cylinder 3 - 702rpm
Cylinder 4 - 688rpm
Cylinder 5 - 700rpm

Compression test
Cylinder 1 - 195rpm
Cylinder 2 - 196rpm
Cylinder 3 - 194rpm
Cylinder 4 - 182rpm
Cylinder 5 - 195rpm

When doing the fuel correction test, a reading outside the permissable parameters (3.00mm3 or -3.00mm3 per injector) indicates a problem with that injector. The ideal reading should be 0.00mm3, which contradicts my theory that injector 4 is faulty. According to these test results, 4 out of 5 injectors are faulty

Fuel correction test
Cylinder 1 - 7.00 mm3
Cylinder 2 - 6.58 mm3
Cylinder 3 - 6.03 mm3
Cylinder 4 - 0.00 mm3
Cylinder 5 - 34.82 mm3

I also done a leak back test. Injector number 4 was leaking back more fuel than the others, though injector 5 wasn't too far behind. Going to try a diesel purge before taking the readings again. Should be interesting. At the minute though it's looking like injector 4 is the culprit. Tomorrows live data tests should hopefully confirm my suspicions beyond doubt. I am hoping the lower compression and combustion figures of cylinder 4 are as a result of a faulty injector and not a valve.

Looking forward to post lm diesel purge results
Fearone is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:14.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.